Back to Network
6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
Document Mentions (6 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government should have told Judge McMah
e a sufficient, independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government shoul
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government should have told Judge McMah
e a sufficient, independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government shoul
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government should have told Judge McMah
e a sufficient, independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government shoul
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government should have told Judge McMah
e a sufficient, independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government shoul
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government should have told Judge McMah
e a sufficient, independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government shoul
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n a criminal action." Botha v. Don King Prods., Inc., No. 97 CIV. 7587 (JGK), 1998 WL 88745, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 1998) (citing Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 743 (2d Cir. 1987) and Martindell, 594 F.2d at 297). Judge Sweet, the same judge who approved the civil protective order upon
investigation in a criminal action." Botha v. Don King Prods., Inc., No. 97 CIV. 7587 (JGK), 1998 WL 88745, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 1998) (citing Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 743 (2d Cir. 1987) and Martindell, 594 F.2d at 297). Judge Sweet, the same judge who approved the civi
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (40)
Entities connected to both Conticommodity Servs and Minpeco S.A.
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Conticommodity·7 w/ Minpeco
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON8 w/ Conticommodity·7 w/ Minpeco
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON8 w/ Conticommodity·7 w/ Minpeco
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON8 w/ Conticommodity·6 w/ Minpeco
MA
Martindell
PERSON8 w/ Conticommodity·6 w/ Minpeco
Julie K. Brown
PERSON7 w/ Conticommodity·6 w/ Minpeco
David Boies
PERSON7 w/ Conticommodity·5 w/ Minpeco
Onondaga
LOCATION7 w/ Conticommodity·5 w/ Minpeco
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Conticommodity·6 w/ Minpeco
Andover Data Servs
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Conticommodity·5 w/ Minpeco
the Southern District
LOCATION7 w/ Conticommodity·5 w/ Minpeco
OP
Orange Prod
PERSON7 w/ Conticommodity·5 w/ Minpeco
United States
LOCATION7 w/ Conticommodity·5 w/ Minpeco
CA
Canfield
PERSON5 w/ Conticommodity·5 w/ Minpeco
SA
Salamelz
PERSON5 w/ Conticommodity·5 w/ Minpeco
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Conticommodity·5 w/ Minpeco
the Office of the U.S.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Conticommodity·5 w/ Minpeco
HJ
Harlan, J.
PERSON5 w/ Conticommodity·5 w/ Minpeco
MC
McNabb
PERSON5 w/ Conticommodity·5 w/ Minpeco
DM
D. Martindell
PERSON5 w/ Conticommodity·5 w/ Minpeco