Epstein Secrets

t 1, United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 22; Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Michael Thomas's Motion to Compel, United States v. Noel, at 8-9, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 35. The fact that materials at issue have been disclosed t

ecords withheld by BOP under Exemption 7 were compiled for law enforcement purposes, thereby satisfying the first prong of the Exemption 7(A) test. See Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); BOP MOL at 8-10. The Times criticizes the Government for arguing that BOP documents—or at least t

t 1, United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 22; Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Michael Thomas's Motion to Compel, United States v. Noel, at 8-9, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 35. The fact that materials at issue have been disclosed t

ecords withheld by BOP under Exemption 7 were compiled for law enforcement purposes, thereby satisfying the first prong of the Exemption 7(A) test. See Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); BOP MOL at 8-10. The Times criticizes the Government for arguing that BOP documents—or at least t

t 1, United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 22; Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Michael Thomas's Motion to Compel, United States v. Noel, at 8-9, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 35. The fact that materials at issue have been disclosed t

ecords withheld by BOP under Exemption 7 were compiled for law enforcement purposes, thereby satisfying the first prong of the Exemption 7(A) test. See Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); BOP MOL at 8-10. The Times criticizes the Government for arguing that BOP documents—or at least t