aived any challenge to this application of Exemption 7(F) in its cross-motion for summary judgment. See Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment ("P. MOL"), at 6 n.2, ECF No. 27. Second, some of the Returned Records contain informa

aived any challenge to this application of Exemption 7(F) in its cross-motion for summary judgment. See Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment ("P. MOL"), at 6 n.2, ECF No. 27. Second, some of the Returned Records contain informa

aived any challenge to this application of Exemption 7(F) in its cross-motion for summary judgment. See Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment ("P. MOL"), at 6 n.2, ECF No. 27. Second, some of the Returned Records contain informa

ATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 2, 2017, the foregoing Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment was filed with the Clerk of the Court and served on counsel on the attached service list using CM/ECF. is/Dexter . Lee 31 EFTA00211748 SERVICE

On February 21, 2019, the Court issued its Opinion and Order granting Petitioners Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, denying the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and ordering the parties to confer and inform the Court by March 8, 2019 regarding how they wish to proceed on determining the issue of a remedy.

Summary Judgment, DE 402; and third, the Government filed a 30-page Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, 1 EFTA00799857 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 412 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2017 Page 2 of 4 DE 401-2. These three documents total 58 pages

MARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Reply to Petitioners' Response to Government's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. JANE DOE 2 CLEARLY EXPRESSED HER DESIRE NOT TO BE TREATED AS A VICTIM OF EPSTEIN During the Government's investigation into Jeff

ATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 6, 2017, the foregoing Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment was filed with the Clerk of the Court and served on counsel on the attached service list using CM/ECF. Is/Dexter A. Lee Dexter A. Lee Assistant U

On February 21, 2019, the Court issued its Opinion and Order granting Petitioners Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, denying the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and ordering the parties to confer and inform the Court by March 8, 2019 regarding how they wish to proceed on determining the issue of a remedy.

MARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Reply to Petitioners' Response to Government's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. JANE DOE 2 CLEARLY EXPRESSED HER DESIRE NOT TO BE TREATED AS A VICTIM OF EPSTEIN During the Government's investigation into Jeff

ATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 2, 2017, the foregoing Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment was filed with the Clerk of the Court and served on counsel on the attached service list using CM/ECF. Is/Dexter A. Lee Dexter A. Lee Assistant U

, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Reply to Petitioners' Response to Respondent's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. Respondent's reply to petitioners' response to respondent's cross-motion for summary judgment is due on Friday, September 15, 2017.

n. Exhibits designated by a letter are attached to the Government's Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. 2 EFTA00799607 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 4 of 176 individuals who had been identified as p