Epstein Secrets

t 1, United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 22; Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Michael Thomas's Motion to Compel, United States v. Noel, at 8-9, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 35. The fact that materials at issue have been disclosed t

lized. See Supp. Christenson Decl. ¶ 16. These prior versions of the ultimate response document were properly withheld under Exemption 5 as drafts. See American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126, 133 (2d Cir. 2016); Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 518 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) ("It is well- settled that

t 1, United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 22; Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Michael Thomas's Motion to Compel, United States v. Noel, at 8-9, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 35. The fact that materials at issue have been disclosed t

lized. See Supp. Christenson Decl. ¶ 16. These prior versions of the ultimate response document were properly withheld under Exemption 5 as drafts. See American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126, 133 (2d Cir. 2016); Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 518 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) ("It is well- settled that

t 1, United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 22; Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Michael Thomas's Motion to Compel, United States v. Noel, at 8-9, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 35. The fact that materials at issue have been disclosed t

it was finalized. See Supp. Decl. ¶ 16. These prior versions of the ultimate response document were properly withheld under Exemption 5 as drafts. See American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126, 133 (2d Cir. 2016); Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 518 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) ("It is well- settled that