Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
w, and should be denied. 1. Martindell Provides No Basis to Grant the Relief the Defendant Seeks Maxwell argues that the Government "circumvented" the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell and "violated Maxwell's rights," which requires suppression of the evidence the Government obtained from the subpoena. (Def.
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
w, and should be denied. 1. Martindell Provides No Basis to Grant the Relief the Defendant Seeks Maxwell argues that the Government "circumvented" the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell and "violated Maxwell's rights," which requires suppression of the evidence the Government obtained from the subpoena. (Def.
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
w, and should be denied. 1. Martindell Provides No Basis to Grant the Relief the Defendant Seeks Maxwell argues that the Government "circumvented" the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell and "violated Maxwell's rights," which requires suppression of the evidence the Government obtained from the subpoena. (Def.
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
w, and should be denied. 1. Martindell Provides No Basis to Grant the Relief the Defendant Seeks Maxwell argues that the Government "circumvented" the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell and "violated Maxwell's rights," which requires suppression of the evidence the Government obtained from the subpoena. (Def.
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both the Second Circuit's and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON47 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON41 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION41 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON31 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION27 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
the Southern District
LOCATION25 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON24 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
MA
Martindell
PERSON19 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION19 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
David Boies
PERSON19 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
Colorado
LOCATION18 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
Eric Schmidt
PERSON17 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
Bronx
LOCATION17 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON17 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
FI
Fisher
PERSON17 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
JI
Jimenez
PERSON17 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
TH
Thompson
PERSON16 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
SW
Sweet
PERSON16 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
Rivera
PERSON16 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON16 w/ the·4 w/ N.Y.