Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ntire district or from a particular geographic area within a district, such as the county or "division" where the offense was committed. See, e.g., Rutenberg v. United States, 245 U.S. 480, 482 (1918) (rejecting claim that defendant had Sixth Amendment right to jury drawn from entire district); United Sta
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required `only where the charges of the indictment are
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ntire district or from a particular geographic area within a district, such as the county or "division" where the offense was committed. See, e.g., Rutenberg v. United States, 245 U.S. 480, 482 (1918) (rejecting claim that defendant had Sixth Amendment right to jury drawn from entire district); United Sta
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required 'only where the charges of the indictment are
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ntire district or from a particular geographic area within a district, such as the county or "division" where the offense was committed. See, e.g., Rutenberg v. United States, 245 U.S. 480, 482 (1918) (rejecting claim that defendant had Sixth Amendment right to jury drawn from entire district); United Sta
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required 'only where the charges of the indictment are
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ntire district or from a particular geographic area within a district, such as the county or "division" where the offense was committed. See, e.g., Rutenberg v. United States, 245 U.S. 480, 482 (1918) (rejecting claim that defendant had Sixth Amendment right to jury drawn from entire district); United Sta
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required `only where the charges of the indictment are
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (127)
Entities connected to both Rutenberg and Cir.2010
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON9 w/ Rutenberg·8 w/ Cir.2010
United States
LOCATION8 w/ Rutenberg·8 w/ Cir.2010
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON8 w/ Rutenberg·6 w/ Cir.2010
Bronx
LOCATION9 w/ Rutenberg·5 w/ Cir.2010
TH
Thompson
PERSON9 w/ Rutenberg·5 w/ Cir.2010
LB
Leon Black
PERSON9 w/ Rutenberg·5 w/ Cir.2010
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON8 w/ Rutenberg·5 w/ Cir.2010
New York State
LOCATION8 w/ Rutenberg·4 w/ Cir.2010
Middletown
LOCATION8 w/ Rutenberg·4 w/ Cir.2010
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON8 w/ Rutenberg·4 w/ Cir.2010
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Rutenberg·6 w/ Cir.2010
John F. Kennedy
PERSON5 w/ Rutenberg·6 w/ Cir.2010
Eastern District
LOCATION7 w/ Rutenberg·4 w/ Cir.2010
Torres
PERSON5 w/ Rutenberg·6 w/ Cir.2010
Florence
LOCATION5 w/ Rutenberg·5 w/ Cir.2010
WA
Walsh
PERSON5 w/ Rutenberg·5 w/ Cir.2010
Bill Richardson
PERSON5 w/ Rutenberg·5 w/ Cir.2010
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Rutenberg·5 w/ Cir.2010
JI
Jimenez
PERSON5 w/ Rutenberg·5 w/ Cir.2010
BO
Bortnovsky
PERSON5 w/ Rutenberg·5 w/ Cir.2010