Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
w, and should be denied. 1. Martindell Provides No Basis to Grant the Relief the Defendant Seeks Maxwell argues that the Government "circumvented" the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell and "violated Maxwell's rights," which requires suppression of the evidence the Government obtained from the subpoena. (Def.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
w, and should be denied. 1. Martindell Provides No Basis to Grant the Relief the Defendant Seeks Maxwell argues that the Government "circumvented" the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell and "violated Maxwell's rights," which requires suppression of the evidence the Government obtained from the subpoena. (Def.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
w, and should be denied. 1. Martindell Provides No Basis to Grant the Relief the Defendant Seeks Maxwell argues that the Government "circumvented" the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell and "violated Maxwell's rights," which requires suppression of the evidence the Government obtained from the subpoena. (Def.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
w, and should be denied. 1. Martindell Provides No Basis to Grant the Relief the Defendant Seeks Maxwell argues that the Government "circumvented" the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell and "violated Maxwell's rights," which requires suppression of the evidence the Government obtained from the subpoena. (Def.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (253)
Entities connected to both Herring v. United States and the Second Circuit's
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON4 w/ Herring·47 w/ the
United States
LOCATION4 w/ Herring·41 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON4 w/ Herring·41 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON4 w/ Herring·31 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Herring·27 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION4 w/ Herring·25 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON4 w/ Herring·24 w/ the
MA
Martindell
PERSON4 w/ Herring·19 w/ the
David Boies
PERSON4 w/ Herring·19 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Herring·19 w/ the
Colorado
LOCATION4 w/ Herring·18 w/ the
Eric Schmidt
PERSON4 w/ Herring·17 w/ the
Bronx
LOCATION4 w/ Herring·17 w/ the
JI
Jimenez
PERSON4 w/ Herring·17 w/ the
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON4 w/ Herring·17 w/ the
FI
Fisher
PERSON4 w/ Herring·17 w/ the
TH
Thompson
PERSON4 w/ Herring·16 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON4 w/ Herring·16 w/ the
Rivera
PERSON4 w/ Herring·16 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON4 w/ Herring·16 w/ the