Epstein Secrets

rs (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar EFTA00710456 —Original Message— From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 12:56 pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are

e, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the laws of chaos (randomness does no occur in nature), as do quantum fields, but consciousness

enerates numbers (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar Original Message From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 12:56 pm Subject: Re: SV: (Sadhu Sanga) Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are

, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the laws of chaos (randomness does no occur in nature), as do quantum fields, but consciousness

enerates numbers (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar —Original Message-- From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 12:56 pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are

ut, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. < That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the laws of chaos (randomness does no occur in nature), as do quantum fields, but consciousness

s (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar EFTA00821671 —Original Message-- From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 : pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are re

, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the laws of chaos (randomness does no occur in nature), as do quantum fields, but consciousness

rates numbers (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar Original Message---- From: Dr. Mike Sosteric < To: online_sadhu_sanga < Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 12:56 pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we

me, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the laws of chaos (randomness does no occur in nature), as do quantum fields, but consciousness

erates numbers (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar Original Message--- From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 12:56 pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are relying on conscio

e, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the laws of chaos (randomness does no occur in nature), as do quantum fields, but consciousness

enerates numbers (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar Original Message From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 12:56 pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are

me, but, arrogant pedant that I am, you shall have them. That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the laws of chaos (randomness does no occur in nature), as do quantum fields, but consciousness

erates numbers (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar ----Original Message From: Dr. Mike Sosteric < To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 1fliaMM Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga) Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we ar

t pedant that I am, you shall have them. EFTA00821891 That Dawkins does not understand consciousness comes as no surprise. Any conversation with Hammeroff is, a priori, non-informative. Consciousness obeys the laws of chaos (randomness does no occur in nature), as do quantum fields, but consciousness