Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00710448

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From: > on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21 July 2016 03:11:04 To: Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the pr

ctors FUDR Friends of the U per Delaware River) - www.fudr.org Fourth International Conference 'Science and Scientist - 2016' August 26 - 27, 2016, Bangalore University http://scsiscs.org/conference/ scienceandscientist/2016 Sponsorship and Donations for Vedanta and Science Dialogue: http://scienceandscientist.org

EFTA00821616

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

we" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21 July 2016 03:11:04 To: Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the pr

tarted". I promise I'll send no more. PM Peter A. Moskovitz Fourth International Conference 'Science and Scientist - 2016' August 26 - 27, 2016, Bangalore University http://scsiscs.org/conference/ scienceandscientist/2016 Sponsorship and Donations for Vedanta and Science Dialogue: http://scienceandscientist.org

EFTA00821662

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

e" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From: on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21July 2016 03:11:04 To Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the prop