Epstein Secrets

engage in illegal sexual activity. In other words, the illegal sexual activity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The district court did not err in i

age to a very rich man on Palm . arguing because didn't want JD#2 to do a massage. JD#2 dea nd =began ato go anyway so that she could make $200. JD#2 states that she knew she would have to take her top off and that Epstein would masturbate during the massage. states that JD#2 knew she would have

d engage in illegal sexual activity. In other words, the illegal sexual activity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The district court did not err in

e e to a very rich man on Palm Beach. and began arguing because didn't want to do a massage. decided to go anyway so that she could make $200. JD#2 states that she knew she would have to take her top off and that Epstein would masturbate during the massage. states that knew she would have to s

d engage in illegal sexual activity. In other words, the illegal sexual activity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The district court did not err in

very rich man on Palm Beach. and began arguing because didn't want JD#16 to do a massage. JD#16 decided to go anyway so that she could make $200. JD#2 states that she knew she would have to take her top off and that Epstein would masturbate during the massage. states that JD#16 knew she would have