Epstein Secrets

couNKEL Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Dershowitz: You have asked me to review the procedures and methods employed by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida in injecting itself into the State of Florida investigation and prosecution of your client, Jeffrey Epstein. In short, and as will be set forth at

sexual conduct must be: an "efficient and compelling purpose," United Stake v. Meacham 115 F.3d 1458, 1495 (10° Cir. 1997); a "motivating purpose " United Suites v. clugfc1.1, 49 F.3d 1079, 1083 (5° Cir. 1995). Of "at least one of the defendant's motivations for taking the trip in the first place," united St

between the ages of thirteen and seventeen to engage in prostitution, among other offenses. The case was presented to the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, which accepted the case for investigation. The Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office was also investigating 4 EFTA00229920 rann97,""-^ Cas

t to the good faith approval of Epstein's counsel, selecting the attorney representative for the individuals identified under the Agreement. If the United Suites tin to assign this responsibility to an independent third-party, both the United States and Epstein retain the right to take good faith objections t

between the ages of thirteen and seventeen to engage in prostitution, among other offenses. The case was presented to the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, which accepted the case for investigation. The Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office was also investigating 4 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000674 EFTA

ct to the good faith approval of Epstein's counsel, selecting the attorney representative for the individuals identified under the Agreanent If the United Suites elects to assign this responsibility to an independent third-parry, both the United States and Epstein retain the right to take good faith objection