Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
2010 the United States District Court entered a Final Order in the above-captioned case dismissing the action with prejudice and closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[t]he Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement and the joint stipu
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
2010 the United States District Court entered a Final Order in the above-captioned case dismissing the action with prejudice and closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[t]he Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement and the joint stipu
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
2010 the United States District Court entered a Final Order in the above-captioned case dismissing the action with prejudice and closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[t]he Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement and the joint stipu
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
2010 the United States District Court entered a Final Order in the above-captioned case dismissing the action with prejudice and closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[tie Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement and the joint stipul
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
2010 the United States District Court entered a Final Order in the above-captioned case dismissing the action with prejudice and closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[tie Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement and the joint stipul
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (22)
Entities connected to both D.E. and the Internal Justice Department
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON47 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
Kenneth Marra
PERSON38 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON38 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON33 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON33 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
SR
Scott Rothstein
PERSON18 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
CH
Chambers
PERSON14 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION11 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
JN
JANE DOE NO
PERSON11 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATION8 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
the State Court
ORGANIZATION7 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
CH
Chmielarz
PERSON6 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
the Florida Rules of Evidence
ORGANIZATION5 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
Justice Department Complaint
ORGANIZATION5 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
the Final Judgment
ORGANIZATION5 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
See American Disability Assn.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ D.E.·5 w/ the
LINNEA
ORGANIZATION4 w/ D.E.·3 w/ the
ER
Epstein I. Rothstein
PERSON3 w/ D.E.·3 w/ the
RJ
R. JOHN
PERSON3 w/ D.E.·3 w/ the
internal Justice Department Proceeding
ORGANIZATION3 w/ D.E.·3 w/ the