Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ecause double jeopardy is meant to protect a defendant from successivepunishments for the same offense, a multiplicitous count does not violate the Clause unless and until sentence is imposed. See Josephberg, 459 F.3d at 355 ("Where there has been no prior conviction or acquittal, the Double Jeopardy
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cause double jeopardy is meant to protect a defendant from successive punishments for the same offense, a multiplicitous count does not violate the Clause unless and until sentence is imposed. See Josephberg, 459 F.3d at 355 ("Where there has been no prior conviction or acquittal, the Double Jeopardy
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cause double jeopardy is meant to protect a defendant from successive punishments for the same offense, a multiplicitous count does not violate the Clause unless and until sentence is imposed. See Josephberg, 459 F.3d at 355 ("Where there has been no prior conviction or acquittal, the Double Jeopardy
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cause double jeopardy is meant to protect a defendant from successive punishments for the same offense, a multiplicitous count does not violate the Clause unless and until sentence is imposed. See Josephberg, 459 F.3d at 355 ("Where there has been no prior conviction or acquittal, the Double Jeopardy
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Clause and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON8 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
Colorado
LOCATION7 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION7 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON7 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
the Southern District
LOCATION7 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
Michael Jackson
PERSON6 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
Rivera
PERSON6 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
PE
Pearce
PERSON6 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
JP
Jeffrey Pagliuca
PERSON6 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
Adriana Ross
PERSON6 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
George Mitchell
PERSON6 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON6 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
Stephen Hawking
PERSON6 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON6 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
Murphy
PERSON6 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
North Carolina
LOCATION6 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.
David Boies
PERSON5 w/ Clause·4 w/ N.Y.