Epstein Secrets

s] motives in traveling was to engage in a sexual act with a minor."); United States v. Yang , 128 F.3d 1065, 1072 (7th Cir.1997); United States v. Meacham , 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States v. Sirois , 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th

at she did not want to return. Because no calls went directly from Epstein or his employees to Jane Doe #9, the exact dates of contact are unknown. JD#9 says that she believes the events occurred around her birthday and there is phone traffic between JD#9 and her recruiter in February, March, and Apr

nt's] motives in traveling was to engage in a sexual act with a minor."); United States Yang, 128 F.3d 1065, 1072 (7th Ci/.1997); United States 1. Meacham, 115 F.3d 14882.1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States Sirois, 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States' Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th Cir.1

Doe #9 and = 4 calls with Ma, and 3 calls with M. JD#9 reported that Illalapproached her one summer when she was working at the Wellington Mall. JD#9 said that she thought she was 16 or 17 years' old at the time. Her telephone contact with be an in July 2004, so this probably was the summer of 20

's] motives in traveling was to engage in a sexual act with a minor."); United States v. Yang, 128 F.3d 1065, 1072 (7th Cir.1997); United States v. Meacham, 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States v. Sirois, 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th

at she did not want to return. Because no calls went directly from Epstein or his employees to Jane Doe #9, the exact dates of contact are unknown. JD#9 says that she believes the events occurred around her birthday and there is phone traffic between JD#9 and her recruiter in February, March, and Ap

s] motives in traveling was to engage in a sexual act with a minor."); United States v. Yang , 128 F.3d 1065, 1072 (7th Cir.1997); United States v. Meacham , 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1997); United States v. Sirois , 87 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1082-83 (5th

most. She estimates that she saw him hundreds of times. There area proximately 220 calls between Jane Doe #9 and , 4 calls with , and 3 calls with JD#9 reported that approached her one summer when she was working at the Wellington Mall. JD#9 said that she thought she was 16 or 17 years' old at the