Epstein Secrets

h other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. alb Dated this /1, th day of March, 2011. Respectfully s Treston E V.I. Bar 10 MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant 5035 Noire Gad; P.O. Box 310 St. Thomas, VI 00804-0310 PHONE: FAX: EMAIL: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certif

EFENDANT IS SUBJECT TO INQUIRY In their First Amended Complaint, it is alleged "[i]n 2005, Epstein engaged the architectural and design services of Juan Pablo Molyneux and J.P. Molyneux Studio, Ltd. ("Molyneux") to design a large-scale, multi-structure, multi-million dollar residential project to be constructed on

oregoing MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ECONSIDERATION OF ORDER ENTERED MAY 24, 2011 to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 by first class U. S. Mail, postage prepaid on this r day of -1t.t , 2011. 41,01,4t4.14. 4/1A et kitr eck

sideration should be granted. I. BRIEF STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY OF CASE In 2005, Plaintiffs contracted with non-parties Juan Pablo Molyneux, a resident of the State of New York, and his company, I. Molyneux Studio, Ltd. (collectively "Molyneux"), a New York corporation, to design a resi

UM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT'S ORDER ENTERED ON MAY 24, 2011, to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 by first class U. S. Mail, postage prepaid on this Is day of tin rI•P , 2011. ait,Cut 6 la& Anna ltftcCo

tion for reconsideration should be granted. I. STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY. In 2005, Plaintiffs contracted with non-parties Juan Pablo Molyneux ("JP"), a resident of the State of New York, and his company, J.P. Molyneux Studio, Ltd. ("Molyneux"), a New York corporation, to design a resident

of the foregoing Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to File An Amended Reply Brief to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 by first class U. S. Mail, postage prepaid on this ,Qcrt- day of ?-La r rU. , 2011. PnottshIGA Anna_ It-t

y shows that the primary, if not sole purpose of the Amended Reply is to attempt to refute, with the use of 7 additional exhibits, the Affidavit of Juan Pablo Molyneux that Plaintiffs filed in support of their Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. As all of the arguments and materials used in the Amended Re