laintiffs [Molyneux], with the assistance of an internationally-known woodworking craftsman [Fancelli Paneling, Inc.], undertook to and did perform the Exhibit B Services, thereby satisfying their obligations pursuant to the Design Services Agreement (Molyneux Action, First Amended Complaint, ¶14). On March 22, 2

hat agreement and the reasonable expectations .of the parties by, among other things: (a) wrongfully rejecting the Plaintiffs' work with respect to the Exhibit B Services; and, (b) absenting themselves from the meetings between the parties which were held to resolve their differences, thereby interfering with and fa

that agreement and the reasonable expectations of the parties by, among other things: (a) wrongfully rejecting the Plaintiffs' work with respect to the Exhibit B Services; and, (b) absenting themselves from the meetings between the parties which were held to resolve their differences, thereby interfering with and fa

n of the Design Services Agreement, Plaintiffs, with the assistance of an internationally-known woodworking craftsman, undertook to and did perform the Exhibit B Services, with the exception of the restaining and refinishing of the wood cabinetry. On January 26 and 27, 2010, Plaintiffs travelled to Little Saint Jame

that agreement and the reasonable expectations of the parties by, among other things: (a) wrongfully rejecting the Plaintiffs' work with respect to the Exhibit B Services; and, (b) absenting themselves from the meetings between the parties which were held to resolve their differences, thereby interfering with and fa

greement, Plaintiffs, with the assistance of an internationally-known woodworking craftsman [Fancelli Paneling, Inc.], undertook to and did perform the Exhibit B Services, thereby satisfying their obligations pursuant to the Design Services Agreement (Molyneux Action, First Amended Complaint,¶14) On March 22, 2010..