Epstein Secrets

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE Defendants. PLAINTIFF

.S. 479, 486 (1951); Ohio v Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (2001). My concern is in part derived from the continued efforts utilized by Edwards in the case of Doe v United States ("the CVRA case"). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth and Four

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE Defendants. PLAINTIFF

.S. 479, 486 (1951); Ohio v Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (2001). My concern is in part derived from the continued efforts utilized by Edwards in the case of Doe v United States ("the CVRA case"). I cannot provide answers/responses to questions relating to my financial history and condition without waiving my Fifth and Four

TA00180369 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM ent 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 27 of 100 nsor R Associates Rernninp and Tranicriptinch Mc. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2006 CF09454AXX STATE OF FLORIDA, -vs- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defenda

ty agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736- KAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated tha