Epstein Secrets

/05/2013 Page 71 of 101 Exhibit C EFTA00799564 ase -cv- ocumen n ere. on 101 oc e age o Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: SO =ICAO COMPLAINT Plaintiff, =, by and through h

y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req

/05/2013 Page 71 of 101 Exhibit C EFTA00795240 ase -cv- ocumen n ere. on 101 oc e age o Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: SO =ICAO COMPLAINT Plaintiff, =, by and through h

y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req

cument n ere. on 101 oc e age o costs and is within the jurisdictional limits of this Court. Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: SO 2008 CA 0 COMPLAINT Plaintiff, =, by and throu

y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req