Epstein Secrets

r the Southern District of Florida accepted Epstein’s case for prosecution, and the FBI] issued victim notification letters to my two clients, minors Jane Doe No. | and Jane Doe No. 2, in June and August 2007. Extensive plea negotiations ensued between the prosecutors and Epstein. On Sept. 24, 2007, the pro

is almost worthless. 29. Atno time did Epstein ever publicly state that Plaintiffs had no role whatsoever in the Epstein’s illegal activities. 30. Asaresult of Epstein’s illegal activities and his association with Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs continue to lose money and suffer damages to this day. (Exhibit K att

012635 TAB 32 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012636 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 20069 " JANE DOE NO. 1, by and through JANE DOE’s FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOR’s FATHER, and . . JANE DOE’s STEPMOTHER, individually, ciV-MA RRA Plaintiffs, MAGISTRATE JUDGH

he then met Ms. Robson again who brought Jane home. Jane was paid $200 by Epstein. Ms. Robson was also paid by Epstein for bringing Jane to him. 14. Asaresult of this encounter with Epstein, the 16-year old Jane experienced trauma, shock, confusion, shame, humiliation and embarrassment. COUNT I Sexual Assa

orney's Office signed a non-prosecution agreement with the multimillionaire. Emily Michot £/1/[email protected] Now 31, Wild is Jane Doe No.1 in “Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 vs. the United States,” which seeks to overturn Epstein’s plea agreement on the grounds that it was executed in violation of the feder

9 Page 27 of 28 to administer her non-profit foundation, or share her life story, and thereby help others who have suffered from sexual abuse. 100. Asaresult of Dershowitz’s and Epstein’s campaign to spread false, discrediting, and defamatory statements about Roberts, Roberts suffered substantial damages i