Epstein Secrets

(S.D. Fla. 2009). Doe No. 102 v Epstein, Case No. 09-80656 (S.D. Fla. 2009); Doe No. 8 v. Epstein, Case No. 09-80802 (S.D. Fla. 2009). 2 Em In re: Jane Doe, Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008). 0911212019 3 Pa CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331875 EFTA_0020460 EFTA02729586

w recognizes a strong public right of access to documents a court considers in connection with sentencing. Sarasota Herald Tribune. Div See. e.g.. Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 2 v. Epstein. Case No. 08-80119 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 3. v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80232 (S.D. Fla. 2008);

sanctions pursuant to Rule 30(dX2) aril (3)(A) and (C) (referencing Rule 37(aX5)), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and compelling the deposition of Jane Doe No. 4 within fifteen (15) days and as grounds therefore would state: 1. On August 16, 2009, the deposition of Jane Doe No. 4 was noticed for Septe

recognizes a strong public right of access to documents a court considers in connection with sentencing. Sec Sarasota Herald Tribune, Div. See, et, Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Case No. 08-80119 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 3. v. Epstein Case No. 08-80232 (S.D. Fla. 2008); D

public disclosure of the victims' identities in these cases, and allowed the Plaintiff in that case to "proceed in this action under the pseudonym 'Jane Doe' ", by Order dated October 6, 2008. 7. Jeffrey Epstein sets forth no facts to support his bare contention that Jane Does 2- 7 use of a pseudonym in

ecognizes a strong public right of access to documents a court considers in connection with sentencing. See Sarasota Herald Tribune Div. See, e.g., Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-80069 (S.D. Fla, 2008). Doe No, 2 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80119 (S.D. Fla. 2008): Doe No. 3. v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80232 (S.D. Fla. 2008);