Epstein Secrets

RE II Deoksbor 5th and nide it clear to all parties that 10 12 exhibits that. here net disclosed by the end of II For Non-Parties L.M., E.M. 4 Jana Doe 22 1a Deoabor -- and I think it nay have been the 14 De her 22 dace -- I'm not sure about that exact 13 la date -- but exhibits that were no

115 1 this case? t I have done it before and have had remittable 2 MR. LINK: That's what I envisioned, your 2 results using now Chief Judge Gerber's, then Judge ) Honor. And I think Rothstein, Epstein all have to 3 Comber here in the Circuit Court, hi➢ voir dire 4 be part of that dialogue.

thered 76:1 116:21 general 3:24 32:24 33:13 79:9 90:22 98:15 generally 33:20 generated 12:22 generically 54:23 generous 108:13 Gerber 115:3 Gerber's 115:2 gest 94:12 getting 15:4 50:15 54:2 65:7 GG 121:18 give 8:15 23:9 43:19 45:12 85:22 88:16 Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2

question in front of you sight now is • very brief, representing three victims; LH, EM and • what to do about this. Well, we knee one thing. • Jane Doe. /Vat ono housekeeping natter. s lie know there's been absolutely no waiver of 10 No have riled a notion to intervene, which is 10 attorney/cl

115 1 this case? t I have done it before and have had remittable 2 MR. LINK: That's what I envisioned, your 2 results using now Chief Judge Gerber's, then Judge ) Honor. And I think Rothstein, Epstein all have to 3 Comber here in the Circuit Court, hi➢ voir dire 4 be part of that dialogue.

thered 76:1 116:21 general 3:24 32:24 33:13 79:9 90:22 98:15 generally 33:20 generated 12:22 generically 54:23 generous 108:13 Gerber 115:3 Gerber's 115:2 gest 94:12 getting 15:4 50:15 54:2 65:7 GG 121:18 give 8:15 23:9 43:19 45:12 85:22 88:16 Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2

, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) ded claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in rces s of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

aintain the integrity of the con tiality order issued in this matter by the Court below, as well as having heard directly fr udge Marra and Judge Gerber, we find as follows: Findinos of Fact —The Court below entered orders on March 25, 2009 and April 23, 2009, specifyi. e that certain specific acts

N, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

in the integrity of the confidentiality order issued in this matter by the Court below, as well as having heard directly from Judge Marra and Judge Gerber, we find as follows: Findings of Fact 1. The Court below entered orders on March 25, 2009 and April 23, 2009, specifying that certain specific ac

public disclosure of the victims' identities in these cases, and allowed the Plaintiff in that case to "proceed in this action under the pseudonym 'Jane Doe' ", by Order dated October 6, 2008. 7. Jeffrey Epstein sets forth no facts to support his bare contention that Jane Does 2- 7 use of a pseudonym in

in The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, Volume 34, The New York Times Press, New York, 1979. 24. "Facilitation of Mourning During Childhood," in Gerber, I., Wiener, A., Kutscher, A., et al., Perspectives on Bereavement, MSS Information Corporation, New York, 1979. 25. "The Cornerstone Treatment of

6, 09-80802, 09-81092, DECLARATION OF ADAM D. HOROWITZ 1. My name is Adam D. Horowitz. I am an attorney for Jane Doe No. 4. 2. The deposition of Jane Doe No. 4 was scheduled for September 16, 2009 at 1:00 p.m. at 350 Australian Ave. South, Suite 115, West Palm Beach, Florida. On the day before the de

in the integrity of the confidentiality order issued in this matter by the Court below, as well as having hoard directly from Judge Marra and Judge Gerber, we find as follows: Finding! of Fact L. The Court below entered orders on March-25, 2009 and April 23, 2009. specifying that certain specific ac