Epstein Secrets

29 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Cc: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Jacobus, Wendy (USAFLS) Subject: Draft Response in Jane Doe Alex and Jeff, Here is a draft response to the emergency petition filed by Jane Doe in the Epstein case. Our first argument is that Doe had no right

eement. In particular, the government wanted Epstein to make a significant concession on one of the elements in 18 U.S.C. 2255. I am speaking with Kim Herd at EOUSA regarding the government's position. In particular, the first argument will have to be cleared by DOJ before I can assert it. Please feel f

PM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Cc: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Jacobus, Wendy (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Draft Response in Jane Doe Here is a second draft, with small rewrites I reduced the discussion of negotiations. The agreement has a confidentiality clause. I note this, beca

eement. In particular, the government wanted Epstein to make a significant concession on one of the elements in 18 U.S.C. 2255. I am speaking with Kim Herd at EOUSA regarding the government's position. In particular, the first argument will have to be cleared by DOJ before I can assert it. Please feel f

5:29 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Cc: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Jacobus, Wendy (USAFLS) Subject: Draft Response in Jane Doe Alex and Jeff, Here is a draft response to the emergency petition filed by Jane Doe in the Epstein case. Our first argument is that Doe had no right

eement. In particular, the government wanted Epstein to make a significant concession on one of the elements in 18 U.S.C. 2255. I am speaking with Kim Herd at EOUSA regarding the government's position. In particular, the first argument will have to be cleared by DOJ before I can assert it. Please feel f

5:29 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Cc: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Jacobus, Wendy (USAFLS) Subject: Draft Response In Jane Doe Alex and Jeff, Here is a draft response to the emergency petition filed by Jane Doe in the Epstein case. Our first argument is that Doe had no right

eement. In particular, the government wanted Epstein to make a significant concession on one of the elements in 18 U.S.C. 2255. I am speaking with Kim Herd at EOUSA regarding the government's position. In particular, the first argument will have to be cleared by DOJ before I can assert it. Please feel f