Epstein Secrets

there, in facts far different from those presented here, the defendant "admitted using both a cellular telephone and a land-line telephone to entice Jane Doe to engage in prostitution" (emphasis added). That admission makes Evans no precedent for a prosecution here, since there is no evidence the phones

umentality of interstate commerce has itself been used for an immoral or injurious purpose. Statutes must be read to eliminate serious doubts as to Constitutionality, as long as such a reading is not plainly contrary to the intent of Congress. United States i X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 78 (1994), citin

t there, in facts far different from ose presented here, the defendant "admitted using both a cellular telephone and a land-line telephone to entice Jane Doe to engage in Prostitution" (emphasis added). That admission makes Evans no precedent for a prosecution here, since there is no evidence the phones

umentality of interstate commerce has itself been used for an immoral or injurious purpose. Statutes must be read to eliminate serious doubts as to Constitutionality, as long as such a reading is not plainly contrary to the i intent of Congress. United States X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 78 (1994), citin

court in Doe'. Epstein, No. 9:08- cv-80I19-KAM (S.D. Fla.). Brunel's attorney asked counsel for Jane Doe to postpone the scheduled deposition date. Jane Doe's counsel agreed, and then Brunel's attorney cancelled the rescheduled deposition date. Brunel's counsel represented that Brunel was outside the count

umentality of interstate commerce has itself been used for an immoral or injurious purpose. Statutes must be read to eliminate serious doubts as to Constitutionality, as long as such a reading is not plainly contrary to the intent of Congress. United States t X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 78 (1994), citin

there, in facts far different from those presented here, the defendant "admitted using both a cellular telephone and a land-line telephone to entice Jane Doe to engage in prostitution" (emphasis added). That admission makes Evans no precedent for a prosecution here, since there is no evidence the phones

ntality of interstate commerce has itself been :: used for an immoral or injurious purpose. Statutes must be read to eliminate serious doubts as to Constitutionality, as long as such a reading is not plainly contrary to the .• intent of Con ess. United States X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 78 (1994), citin

there, in facts far different from those presented here, the defendant "admitted using both a cellular telephone and a land-line telephone to entice Jane Doe to engage in Prostitution" (emphasis added). That admission makes Evans no precedent for a prosecution here, since there is no evidence the phones

umentality of interstate commerce has itself been used for an immoral or injurious purpose. Statutes must be read to eliminate serious doubts as to Constitutionality, as long as such a reading is not plainly contrary to the intent of Congress. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 78 (1994), citi

there, in facts far different from those presented here, the defendant "admitted using both a cellular telephone and a land-line telephone to entice Jane Doc to engage in prostitution" (emphasis added). That admission makes Evans no precedent for a prosecution here, since there is no evidence the phones

umentality of interstate commerce has itself been used for an immoral or injurious purpose. Statutes must be read to eliminate serious doubts as to Constitutionality, as long as such a reading is not plainly contrary to the intent of Congress. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 78 (1994), citi

there, in facts far different from those presented here, the defendant admitted using both a cellular telephone and a land-line telephone to entice Jane Doe to engage in prostitution" (emphasis added). That admission makes Evans no precedent for a prosecution here, since there is no evidence the phones

umentality of interstate commerce has itself been used for an immoral or injurious purpose. Statutes must be read to eliminate serious doubts as to Constitutionality, as I ng as such a reading is not plainly contrary to the intent of Congress United States X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 78 (1994), citing