Epstein Secrets

of a federal case, but I don't recall discussing that at the time. 35 I had never before used a non-prosecution 34 As I noted in my filings in the Jane Doe' United States litigation, I had concerns about informing the victims that part of the negotiations involved securing for them the right to obtain d

vestigation Dear Ms. Ingersoll: Attached please find the written response of Assistant United States Attorney A. Marie Villafafia to the letter of Jeffrey R. Ragsdale, dated April 2, 2019, regarding the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. AUSA Villafafia separately has sent you encrypted disks containing t

tein's state guilty plea, two of Epstein's victims filed suit against the United States alleging violations of the Crime Victim's Rights Act (CVRA). Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States, S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-CV-KAM. The CVRA requires members of the Justice Department to use their "best efforts

n firm, Biran Kelly, before joining Baker Donelson as a partner. 5 EFTA00225018 14. On April 2, 2019, Mr. Biran received a five-page letter from Jeffrey R. Ragsdale, Principal Deputy Director of OPR, describing the scope of OPR's investigation and its view of my role: [OPR] has initiated an investigation into

Department's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) arising out of a decision by United States District Judge Kenneth A. Marra in the matter of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2I United States, S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra; (3) the materials are needed to avoid an injustice in another proceeding, th

have every piece of relevant material and my memory may be imperfect.' I have organized the response to conform with the April 2, 2019 letter from Jeffrey R. Ragsdale to Jonathan Biran. Please note that there were numerous oral and written communications between others at the U.S. Attorney's Office and the Justice