3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
TES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE II Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and Defen
inely "are obligated to raise and decide issues of subject matterjurisdiction sua sponte any time it appears subject matter jurisdiction is absent." Carias v. Lenox Financial Mortgage Corporation 2008 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 20345 *1 (N.D. Cal. March 5, 2008). In Carias, after granting summary judgment on the
TES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE II Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and Defen
subject matter jurisdiction is absent." Carias U. Lenox Financial Mortgage Corporation 2008 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 20345 *1 (N.D. Cal. March 5, 2008). In Carias, after granting summary judgment on the sole federal claim, the Court remanded the State claims to state court, stating: "The Court declines to exer
ould ultimately result in reversible error at any trial. II. Conclusion and Prayer for Relief 22. Epstein requests the following relief: a. That JANE DOE's Motion to Proceed Anonymously be denied; b. That this Court grant Epstein's Motion and that JANE DOE be identified by her legal name in the style
nely "are obligated to raise and decide issues of subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte any time it appears subject matter jurisdiction is absent." Carias v. Lenox Financial Mortgage Corporation, 2008 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 20345 *1 (N.D. Cal. March 5, 2008). In Carias, after granting summary judgment on th
Entities connected to both Jane Doe and Carias

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONRobert D. Critton
PERSONIsidro Manuel Garcia
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Jacksonville
LOCATION
Colorado
LOCATIONState Court
ORGANIZATIONTwombly
PERSON
Bailey
PERSONGibson
PERSONMichael Pike
PERSONConley
PERSON
James Patterson
PERSON
Walters
PERSON
Scalia
PERSONTompkins
PERSON
Richmond
LOCATIONTilton
PERSON