Epstein Secrets

OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

cess server also mailed a copy of the summons and complaint to Defendant on May 5, 2008, via first class mail. (DE 4)." It is my understanding that the Affidavit of Service (DE 4) crosses out language regarding mail to the Defendant, and that the process server in this case did not mail a copy of the Summons and Compla

MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) and S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1, hereby files this M

nst Defendant, and states as follows: 1. On May 7, 2008, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was served with a Summons and Complaint in this case. A copy of the Affidavit of Service is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1), Defendant was required to answer or otherwise serve a

TO ENTER DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT, OR ALTERNATIVELY, FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO SERVE PROCESS, AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55(a) and 4(m), and S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1, hereby files

lows: 1. This action was filed on February 6, 2008. On May 7, 2008, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was served with the Summons and Complaint. A copy of the Affidavit of Service was filed with the Court. (D.E. 4). 2. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1), Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was required to answer or otherwise serve a r

TES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE II Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and Defen

N.Y.S.C., Appellate Division, June 26, 2008). Defendant first argues that Plaintiffs Motion is defective because the Plaintiff did not timely file the Affidavit of Service. However, a delay in filing proof of service under CPLR 308 is merely a procedural irregularity, not jurisdictional, and may be corrected nunc pro

MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 3, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) and S.D. Ha. L.R. 7.1, hereby files this Mo

nst Defendant, and states as follows: 1. On May 7, 2008. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was served with a Summons and Complaint in this case. A copy of the Affidavit of Service is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1), Defendant was required to answer or otherwise serve a