Epstein Secrets

pstein cannot possibly make a determination as to whether or not he seeks to exclude anything under this exhibit identification. 106. Pleadings of Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. US case. 107. Jeffrey Epstein 5th Amendment Speech. This is so overbroad that Epstein cannot possibly make a determination as to whether o

.2d 1205, 1213-14 (Fla. 1980) (holding improper a question of a witness which sought "to elicit the individual and personal view of the witness."); Hernandez v. State, 575 So.2d 1321, 1322 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (holding that it was reversible error to admit testimony of police officers and teacher that sexual abuse

back Funding, ac, et at v. Scott W. Rothstein, et aL, Case No. 09-062943(19); Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein. 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893-CIV Marra/Johnson. Rothstein returned to South Florida in November 2009 to face federal criminal charges and civil cl

e of probable cause is measured by an objective standard, not based on an officer's underlying intent or subjective 21 EFTA00799359 motivation." Hernandez v. State, 784 So.2d at 1128 (quoting State v. T.P., 588 So. 2d 286, 287 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)). Accordingly, "[t]he principal components of a determination of

ck Funding, LLC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et aL, Case No. 09-062943(19); Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein. 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893- CIV Marra/Johnson. Rothstein returned to South Florida in November 2009 to face federal criminal charges and civil cl

e of probable cause is measured by an objective standard, not based on an officer's underlying intent or subjective 25 EFTA00583976 motivation." Hernandez v. State, 784 So.2d at 1128 (quoting State v. T.P., 588 So. 2d 286, 287 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)). Accordingly, "[t]he principal components of a determination of