Epstein Secrets

1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08)18:2008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, a/k/a, JANE DOE NO. I, Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. MOTION TO REMAND Plaintiff Jane Doe moves the Court to remand this act

to the conspiracy." Walters'. Blankenship, 931 So. 2d 137, 140 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (citing Florida Fern Growers Ass'n, Inc.' Concerned Citizens of Putnam County, 616 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)). As Defendants point out, there muse be an "actionable underlying tort or wrong" for an actionable conspiracy c

led by Jeffrey Epstein. (Tein, Michael) (Entered: 09/05/2008) 09/15/2008 22 r 3" KB REPLY to Response to Motion re 11 MOTION to Remand filed by Jane Doe. (Kuvin, Spencer) (Entered: 09/15/2008) 09/16/2008 21 r 893 KB NOTICE of Substitution of Counsel by Theodore Jon Leopold on behalf ofJane Doe (

to the conspiracy." Walters'. Blankenship, 931 So. 2d 137, 140 (Ha. 5th DCA 2006) (citing Florida Fern Growers Ass'n, Inc.'. Concerned Citizens of Putnam County, 616 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)). As Defendants point out, there muse be an "actionable underlying tort or wrong" for an actionable conspiracy c

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION EFTA_R1_00004151 EFTA01731371 Jeffrey

y 5 EFTA_R1_00004155 EFTA01731375 be inadequate,' and the burden for making such a showing is `minimal."'/d. (emphasis added), quoting Clark v. Putnam County; 168 F.3d 458, 461 (11th Cir. 1999). See, e.g., Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers 302 F.3d 1242, 1255 (11th Cir. 2002X"The proposed