Epstein Secrets

M Document 326 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:08-CV-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER This cause is b

s, and incompetence of public law enforcement officials .... are of vital interest to citizens in evaluating the performance of their government."); Floyd v. City of New York, 283 F.R.D. 153, 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (case involving the unfair treatment of participants "in the criminal justice system" "presents an is

M Document 326 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:08-CV-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER This cause is b

s, and incompetence of public law enforcement officials .... are of vital interest to citizens in evaluating the performance of their government."); Floyd v. City of New York, 283 F.R.D. 153, 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (case involving the unfair treatment of participants "in the criminal justice system" "presents an is

"necessary to complete the story of the crime on trial." United States v. Robinson, 702 F.3d 22, 37 (2d Cir. 2012) ("Robinson argued at trial that Jane Doe was his `girlfriend' and that he had no control over her prostitution activities. Evidence that Robinson was in the prostitution business and contro

7028954, at *3 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Thus, 'the rejection of expert testimony is the exception rather than the rule.'" Floyd v. City of New York, 861 F. Supp. 2d 274, 287 7 EFTA00088809 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (citing Fed. R. Evid. 702 Advisory Committee's Notes (2000 Amendments)). "[T]h