Epstein Secrets

advised that he was generally supportive of the notion that we should get access to the Jane Doe Evidence, but needed to re-familiarize himself with Jane Doe's EFTA00788395 Sigrid McCawley, Esq. August 8, 2017 Page 2 transcript and documents. Mr. Edwards told us that he would call us back to continue o

ortunity to depose Jeffrey Epstein. As a preliminary matter, we are surprised to receive this letter from you. As you know, on July 17, 2017, Judge John Koeltl issued an Order Under Seal ("July 17 Order"), in which he granted the defendants permission to seek relief from the Protective Order "to submit docu

advised that he was generally supportive of the notion that we should get access to the Jane Doe Evidence, but needed to re-familiarize himself with Jane Doe's EFTA00582845 Sigrid McCawley, Esq. August 8, 2017 Page 2 transcript and documents. Mr. Edwards told us that he would call us back to continue o

ortunity to depose Jeffrey Epstein. As a preliminary matter, we are surprised to receive this letter from you. As you know, on July 17, 2017, Judge John Koeltl issued an Order Under Seal ("July 17 Order"), in which he granted the defendants permission to seek relief from the Protective Order "to submit docu

ctive Order as it applies to the Jane Doe Evidence. Mr. Edwards advised that he was generally supportive of the notion that we should get access to Jane Doe's deposition transcript, but needed to re-read the transcript. Mr. Doc. # DC-10276358 v 1 EFTA00583038 Sigrid McCawley, Esq. August 8, 2017 Page

rtunity to depose Jeffrey Epstein. As a preliminary matter, we are surprised to receive this letter from you. As you know, on July 17, 2017, Judge John Koeltl issued an Order Under Seal ("July 17 Order"), in which he granted the defendants to seek relief from a Protective Order in the v. Maxwell matter