Who is Nathan Werksman in the Epstein files?

Nathan Werksman is a plaintiffs' personal injury attorney who represented a Jane Doe victim in a 2020 civil lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate executors. He appears in legal correspondence and court filings while working with the Los Angeles firm Panish Shea & Boyle LLP on the case.

What role did Nathan Werksman play in Epstein-related litigation?

Werksman served as legal counsel for victims pursuing civil claims against Epstein's estate. In the documents, he coordinated discovery requests and filed court papers in the case Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., which targeted the estate's executors. He later represented multiple Epstein victims in lawsuits against the FBI for failing to investigate abuse allegations.

Did Nathan Werksman have any personal connection to Jeffrey Epstein?

No. Werksman is an attorney who represented Epstein's victims, not someone personally connected to Epstein. He appears in the documents solely in his professional capacity as plaintiffs' counsel in civil litigation against the estate.

Who is Nathan Werksman in the Epstein files?

Nathan Werksman is a plaintiffs' personal injury attorney who represented a Jane Doe victim in a 2020 civil lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate executors. He appears in legal correspondence and court filings while working with the Los Angeles firm Panish Shea & Boyle LLP on the case.

What role did Nathan Werksman play in Epstein-related litigation?

Werksman served as legal counsel for victims pursuing civil claims against Epstein's estate. In the documents, he coordinated discovery requests and filed court papers in the case Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., which targeted the estate's executors. He later represented multiple Epstein victims in lawsuits against the FBI for failing to investigate abuse allegations.

Did Nathan Werksman have any personal connection to Jeffrey Epstein?

No. Werksman is an attorney who represented Epstein's victims, not someone personally connected to Epstein. He appears in the documents solely in his professional capacity as plaintiffs' counsel in civil litigation against the estate.

Back to People & Entities

Nathan Werksman

Person

Total Mentions

Documents

Connected Entities

Person referenced in documents

Nathan Werksman is a plaintiffs' attorney who represented Jane Doe in a 2020 civil lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate executors (Darren Indyke and others) in the Southern District of New York.

Werksman appears in the documents as legal counsel working with the law firm Panish Shea & Boyle LLP on behalf of a Jane Doe plaintiff. The mentions show him coordinating discovery requests, including a Touhy request for documentary evidence from federal authorities, and being listed as counsel on court filings. All four mentions are from legal correspondence and court documents related to the civil case Jane Doe v. Indyke et al. (SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF) filed in 2020.

Key Highlights

•Represented Jane Doe in civil lawsuit against Epstein estate executors Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn filed in January 2020
•Worked with Panish Shea & Boyle LLP on discovery and evidence gathering, including requesting documents from the SDNY investigation
•Later went on to represent multiple Epstein victims in lawsuits against the FBI for failing to investigate sex abuse allegations dating back to 1996

Frequently Asked Questions

Books for Further Reading

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

Julie K. Brown

Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

James Patterson

Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein

Bradley J. Edwards

Victims' attorney's firsthand account

Document Mentions (20 of 65)

EFTA00019101 - EFTA00019110

1 mention

t may deem just and proper. Respectfully submitted, Dated: January 16, 2020 Kevin Boyle (admission pending) Robert Glassman (admission pending) Nathan Werksman (admission pending) PANISH SHEA & BOYLE LLP 11111 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Telephone: (310) 477-1700 Facsimile: (310)

Page: EFTA00019109 →

EFTA00020088 - EFTA00020089

1 mention

have the dots gathered (happy to do redactions again if helpful). Thanks, From: Robert Glassman c Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 3:08 PM To: Cc: >; Nathan Werksman Keilah Betts Subject: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20- cv-00484-JGK-D

Page: EFTA00020088 →

EFTA00030341 - EFTA00030342

1 mention

Monday, June 8, 2020 3:08 PM To: Cc: Betts < Subject: Request for Tangible and Documentary 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Importance: High < wrote: ; Nathan Werksman Keilah Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. Dear Mr. Please see the attached letter of today's date. A copy will al

Page: EFTA00030342 →

Sponsored

EFTA00073468.pdf

EFTA00073468

1 mention

From: To: Robert Glassman < Cc: " , Nathan Werksman SIRS Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 21:29:37 +0000 Robert, We wanted to ask if it might be possible to start at 10:00 on

EFTA00073477.pdf

EFTA00073477

1 mention

From: Robert Glassman To: a ll Cc: ' II , Nathan Werksman > Subject: Re: SDNY investigation Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:04:02 +0000 All - just got this message from Good morning! My nanny just canceled on

EFTA00074294.pdf

EFTA00074294

1 mention

From: ' " To: Robert Glassman > Cc: ' " ' , Nathan Werksman Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 22:05:44 +0000 Totally understand, just wanted to ask. We'll see you Monday at 11:00. And t

Sponsored

EFTA00074289.pdf

EFTA00074289

1 mention

From: Robert Glassman O> To: a ll Cc: ' , Nathan Werksman Subject: Re: SDNY investigation Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:51:28 +0000 — what's your cell again? Robert S. Glassman Panish Shea & Boyle psblaw.c

EFTA00079636.pdf

EFTA00079636

1 mention

From: Robert Glassman <a To:' Cc: ' ' II , Nathan Werksman Subject: Re: SDNY investigation Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 21:13:40 +0000 unfortunately, we can't do earlier than 11. She just needs time to get to my

EFTA00084202.pdf

EFTA00084202

1 mention

d thanks for that additional info as well. M. Original Message From: Robert Glassman Sent: Frida , December 13 2019 16:14 To: Cc: aNIMME>; Nathan Werksman Ce- Subject: Re: SDNY investigation M, unfortunately, we can't do earlier than 11. She just needs time to get to my office after taking care of kid

Sponsored

EFTA00084175.pdf

EFTA00084175

1 mention

gathered (happy to do redactions again if helpful). Thanks, From: Robert Glassman < Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 3:08 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: < >; Nathan Werksman Keilah Betts <i )' Subject: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20- cv-00484

EFTA00092531.pdf

EFTA00092531

1 mention

From: To: Robert Glassman C > Cc: ' <MMIE> ' , Nathan Werksman Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 00:51:33 +0000 Robert, Based on media reports today it looks like you filed the civil laws

EFTA00090575.pdf (email 2: RE: SDNY investigation)

EFTA00090575_email_002

1 mention

From: Sent: Friday, February 07, 2020 3:08 PM To: Robert Glassman Cc: [mailto: ; Nathan Werksman < ; Kevin Boyle Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Robert, We should be able to do any time Wednesday through Frida.h-28th) of that week, with a pre

Sponsored

EFTA00090575.pdf (email 4: RE: SDNY investigation)

EFTA00090575_email_004

1 mention

s, >>>>» >>>>» >>>>>> -----Ori inal Messa e >>>>». From: >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 04.2019 13:06 >>>>» To: Robert Glassman >>>>» Cc: ; Nathan Werksman >>>>» >>>>» >>>>» Subject: RE: SDNY investigation >>>>» >>»» Hi Robert, >>>>» >>>>>> Following up on our discussion a couple weeks ago, would

EFTA00092486.pdf (email 1: Re: SDNY investigation)

EFTA00092486

1 mention

From: Kevin Boyle To: Robert Glassman Cc: Nathan Werksman Subject: Re: SDNY investigation Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:58:56 +0000 Also all— No objection that I can see from ud regarding these subpoenas (wit

EFTA00092486.pdf (email 3: RE: SD)

EFTA00092486_email_003

1 mention

good on your end? > thanks, > Ori inal Messa e > From: > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2020 15:52 > To: Robert Glassman < > > Cc: • cz iMIW; Nathan Werksman ; Kevin Boyle > Subject: RE: SD > Robert, > Thanks very much for getting back to us -- I left a voicemail just a few minutes ago, hadn't yet seen

Sponsored

EFTA00092486.pdf (email 5: RE: SDNY investigation)

EFTA00092486_email_005

1 mention

>» >>>>>» >>>>>>> -----Ori inal Messa e >>>>>» From: >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2019 13:06 >>>>>>> To: Robert Glassman >>>>>» Cc: ; Nathan Werksman >>>>>» < >>>>>» >>>>>» Subject: RE: SDNY investigation >>>>>» >>>>>» Hi Robert, >>>>>» >>>>>>> Following up on our discussion a couple weeks a

EFTA00090559.pdf (email 1: RE: SDNY investigation)

EFTA00090559

1 mention

From: Robert Glassman To: " Cc: , Nathan Werksman , Kevin Boyle Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:55:29 +0000 Thanks for letting us know. Can you send me a list of the sch

EFTA00090559.pdf (email 2: RE: SDNY investigation)

EFTA00090559_email_002

1 mention

Ori inal Messa e From: Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 17:09 To: Robert Glassman < Cc: Nathan Werksman Kevin Boyle Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Confirmed, thanks -- see you at 11:00 on the 27th. Original Message From: Robert Glassman Sent: M

Sponsored

EFTA00090559.pdf (email 3: RE: SDNY investigation)

EFTA00090559_email_003

1 mention

Original Message From: Robert Glassman < Sent: Frida Febru. To: Cc: Nathan Werksman < Subject: RE: SDNY investigation 2/27 works. Thanks, and see you then. Robert Glassman, Esq. Panish Shea & Boyle LLP Web: www.psblaw.com Kevin

EFTA00016896 - EFTA00016900

1 mention

From: To: Robert Glassman Cc: , Nathan Werksman <N Subject: Re: SDNY investigation Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:13:49 +0000 Hi Robert— I just saw your email about scheduling. I'm checking with the

Page: EFTA00016896 →

Sponsored