Epstein Secrets

lt* Dts ?LA s2t1 rsokinasz imerama (Aims '4'.1-..tz pi/natl.% to Stet easeP32.3 IL_ 10 Amon awased 41aii Dessitowit.5;: of Noisily Wising a raker, Jane Doe g, provide4 by F.-to, stelLici-ssi The aiegations egainst De:cap-ult.', were swan= by the judge aid elirnineith from the case because he said they i

sé by Julie Brown. in the Miami Herald revealed Jane Doe 3 to beirrginia Giuffre, who wasprevitrasly known

pment Board, listing the Business advisors involved and submitted both Letters of Involvement to the Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers, John James, who then denied the involvement of Roger Kirchner in the Medical Business Plans development. This denial alerted me to Suspicious Activity occurrin

ne Does v. United States (2014)4.560.i A L PISCSE Rt , 'tun eita-ti KILN t\f." Gw A December 3o, 204, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doer and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Clime Victims' is ct y e U.S. Department of Justice's bITA with Epstein and his l

pment Board, listing the Business advisors involved and submitted both Letters of involvement to the Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers, John James, who then denied the involvement of Roger Kirchner in the Medical Business Plans development. This denial alerted me to Suspicious Activity occurrin

Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) A December 30, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe i (Courtney Wild) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S. Department of Justice's NPA with Epstein and his limited 2008

development began - Hand written form Installed on a computer not connected to the internet - April 13th 2013 Contesting of Intellectual Property / John James, Johnson Lawyers / 8th April 2013 Obtaining letters of Involvement in the Medical Business Plan Development Fraudulent activity continued - Resulti