Epstein Secrets

on of Ms. in a long-running pro bono crime victims' rights act case Professor Cassell is handling through the University of Utah appellate clinic, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736 (filed S.D. Fla. 2008). 3 EFTA00600138 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 89 Filed 04/10/16 Page

ed as a motions). Dated: April 10, 2016 8 EFTA00600143 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 89 Filed 04/10/16 Page 9 of 10 Respectfully Submitted, BOLES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP By: /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid McCawley (Pro Hac Vice) Boles, Schiller & Flexner LLP 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200 F

CASE NO.: 1:17-CV-00616 JANE DOE 43, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN GHISLAINE MAXWELL, AND Defendants. / FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff JANE DOE 43, by and through her undersigned counsel, for her claims against Defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, , and , alleges upon personal kn

,. 29 EFTA00615967 Case 1:17-cv-00616-JGK Document 45 Filed 06/05/17 Page 30 of 31 By: /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards PRO HAC VICE BOLES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP David Boies Boles Schiller & Flexner LLP Sigrid McCawley Meredith Schultz Boles Schiller & Flexner LLP PRO HAC VICE Pa

See McCawley Decl. at Exhibit 7, Q Do you know Jane Doe-102 A Fifth. See McCawley Decl. at Exhibit 7,

igators of posting the subpoenas to the known locations and also sending the subpoenas via U.S. mail. Dated: May 25, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, BOLES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP By: /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid McCawley (Pro Hac Vice) Meredith Schultz (Pro Hac Vice) Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 401

k it all apart and put it all in one and I really didn't even need it at all. But thank you. And then in the binders I did get, with respect to the Jane Doe issue, the one thing that I actually wanted to see which was the two competing proposed orders, one of those was missing from the binder. Defendan

d literally bring people to the table as a settlement discussion. And then when you report back, you'll have something to report back on. Yes? MR. BOLES: Your Honor, David Boies. I agree completely with the Court we need to meet among ourselves. You got good counsel on both sides here. I think that

RDS thought you could steal my private life by using my name/my family/my reports, yet then you only compensated the adult sex workers (protected as JANE DOE) who stayed 6-13 years on PURPOSE?! THOSE ARE RUTHLESS HEIDI FLEISS TYPES. THAT IS PROSTITUTION! THEY ARE THE CULPABLES whom Epstein called "money

>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> On May 8, 2025, at 8:54 PM, >» >»= >>> This is the adult employee who left me for dead. It's sickening BEDWARDS and BOLES think sexual intercourse for pay is "rape", while actually being assaulted sexually by one's lawyer is "to be ignored". They think being kidnapped a

RDS thought you could steal my private life by using my name/my family/my reports, yet then you only compensated the adult sex workers (protected as JANE DOE) who stayed 6-13 years on PURPOSE?! THOSE ARE RUTHLESS HEIDI FLEISS TYPES. THAT IS PROSTITUTION! THEY ARE THE CULPABLES whom Epstein called "money

Sent from my iPhone > On May 8, 2025, at 8:54 PM, wrote: > Emily, > This is the adult employee who left me for dead. It's sickening BEDWARDS and BOLES think sexual intercourse for pay is "rape", while actually being assaulted sexually by one's lawyer is "to be ignored". They think being kidnapped a