Epstein Secrets

/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. 2 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 Wnt Meer Street. Suite 800. Al'NM FL 33130, Maud Pax 305.358236

rom Mr. Robert Critton is attached hereto as Exhibit D). Defendant's counsel then sent a letter on May 21, 2009 citing the Comment to Rule 4-4.2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct that states that "(pJarties to a matter S Podhtnst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagkx Street, suite aeo, Maud, El. 33130, Miami Fax • Fat Lauderdale E

rgument, on April 18, 2014, the Eleventh Circuit ruled in favor of the victims. at firmed this Court's decision, and simultaneously lifted its stay. Jane Doe 4 EFTA00209239 No. 1i United States, ---F.3d---, 2014 WL 1509015, No. 13-12923 at 23. The Circuit explained that "[a]lthough plea negotiations are

s from Epstein's defense attorneys discussing the case as well. The statements made by both victims counsel and defense counsel are proper, because the Rules of Professional Conduct plainly allow discussion with the media about "information contained in a public record." ABA R. Prof. Conduct 3.6(a)(2). Epstein also complains ab

tigation of Bruce E. Reinhart Dear Mr. Ferrer: PAUL G. CASSELL RONALD N. BOYCE PRESIDENTIAL PROFESSOR OF CRIMINAL LAW As you recall, I represent Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 ("the victims") in their efforts to protect their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). You were nice enough

ropriate disciplinary authorities. See Florida Rule Prof. Conduct, Rule 4-8.3 ("A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the appropria

Steptoe") to represent you ("You") in connection with a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, captioned Jane Doe 43 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, is Lesley Groff, and a i = No. 1:17-cv-00616 (SDNY), filed on January 26, 2017 ("Litigation' ). his le

e work for a period of six months and there are no ongoing appeals proceedings or intellectual property maintenance obligations. In accordance with the Rules of Professional Conduct, Steptoe will continue to protect the confidentiality of Client's information after the engagement has ended. Either Steptoe or the Client may term

o filed a false statement in a Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) case in the Southern District of Florida. The recognized victims in that CVRA case — Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 — through undersigned legal counsel ( M) requested a criminal investigation. See Exhibit 1. Through the Executive Office for U.S. A

ropriate disciplinary authorities. See Florida Rule Prof. Conduct, Rule 4-8.3 ("A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the appropria