Epstein Secrets

ile folder with signed sealed Orders, and light green file folder with Exhibits to Motion to Unseal Grand Jury Materials notes, White binder with Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Consolidated Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment with Incorporated Memorandum of Law Bo

s Agrmt & Addendum (file folder) Mtgw/ Ken Starr (file folder) MTarget Letter (file folder) Notes re Post Agreement Communications (file folder) Bert Ocariz (file folder) 6/19/08 Starr Submission to the DAG (file folder) 6/3/08 Sloman Submission to the DAG (file folder) 5/27/08 Starr Submission to the

Office. Mr. Edwards first saw a reference to the NPA on or after July 9, 2008, when the Government filed its EFTA00206707 responsive pleading to Jane Doe's emergency petition. That pleading was the first public mention of the non-prosecution agreement and the first disclosure to Mr. Edwards (and thus to

made to the victims of the non-prosecution agreement. 14. On about September 27, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie revealed to an attorney (Bert Ocariz), who was under discussion to be a representative of victims of Epstein's sexual abuse, that a non-prosecution agreement was in the process of being

U.S. Attorney's Office. Mr. Edwards first saw a reference to the NPA on or after July 9, 2008, when the Government filed its responsive pleading to Jane Doe's emergency petition. That pleading was the first public mention of the non-prosecution agreement and the first disclosure to Mr. Edwards (and thus to

ntion was made to the victims of the non-prosecution agreement. 14. On about September 27, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney revealed to an attorney (Bert Ocariz), who was under discussion to be a representative of victims of Epstein's sexual abuse in civil litigation, that the government was in the process o

Office. Mr. Edwards first saw a reference to the NPA on or after July 9, 2008, when the Government filed its EFTA00206744 responsive pleading to Jane Doe's emergency petition. That pleading was the first public mention of the non-prosecution agreement and the first disclosure to Mr. Edwards (and thus to

made to the victims of the non-prosecution agreement. 14. On about September 27, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie revealed to an attorney (Bert Ocariz), who was under discussion to be a representative of victims of Epstein's sexual abuse, that a non-prosecution agreement was in the process of being

U.S. Attorney's Office. Mr. Edwards first saw a reference to the NPA on or after July 9, 2008, when the Government filed its responsive pleading to Jane Doe's emergency petition. That pleading was the first public mention of the non-prosecution agreement and the first disclosure to Mr. Edwards (and thus to

ntion was made to the victims of the non-prosecution agreement. 14. On about September 27, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney revealed to an attorney (Bert Ocariz), who was under discussion to be a representative of victims of Epstein's sexual abuse in civil litigation, that the government was in the process o

U.S. Attorney's Office. Mr. Edwards first saw a reference to the NPA on or after July 9, 2008, when the Government filed its responsive pleading to Jane Doe's emergency petition. Thet—pleading—was—the—ficst—publie mention of the non prosecution agreement and the first disclosure to Mr. Edwards (and thus to

Lefleowitt-te-the-LITSnactterfter fer-the-Seuthern-Distriet-ef Flerida, Le1kewi stated that ASUA had "assidueusly" hidden frem him the fact that Bert Ocariz was a friend of -beyffienel,1478rAuemeyls-Gefespendenee-at-267, If aeettrate-tembeyffiendue-desenbe-whe-had-reeemmended-Geana—M-at-268-Lefleavvitz

er in the former firm of Herman, , & Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder

From: Jay Lefkowitz [[email protected]] Sent: y, September 27, 2007 2:53 PM To: , Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: e. onference Call with Bert Ocariz Marie -I will not be able to get back to you until tomorrow. However, some of the questions he raised cause me some serious concern. 1. Can we get

article: "Palm Beach Man Faces Lawsuit in Teen Sex Case" 170. 1/29/2008 Motion to Intervene, Jane Doe No. 1, et aL v. Epstein, 08-80069 (filed by Jane Doe's mother) 171. 1/29/2008 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Jane Doe No. 1 Reaching Age of Majority, Jane Doe No. 1, et aL v. Epstein, 08-80069 (fil

t 106. 9/26/2007, 11:49 am Emails between and Lefkowitz re: options for representative 107. 9/27/2007, 10:52 am Email from to Lefkowitz re: Bert Ocariz 108. 9/27/2007, 11:08 am Emails between and Lefkowitz re: Bert Ocariz 109. 9/27/2007, 3:06 pm Emails between and Lefkowitz re: Bert Ocariz

**M4c#***** Tracking: 3042 EFTA00191185 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners. vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S RESPONSE TO PE i i i LONERS' REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

07 11:49 a.m., RE: One more thing (2 pages) E-mail, Marie Villafana to Jay Lefkowitz, dated September 27, 2007 10:52 a.m., RE Conference Call with Bert Ocariz (1 page) 6 EFTA00191191 E-mail, Jay Leflcowitz to Marie Villafana, dated September 27, 2007 10:57 a.m., RE: Conference call with Bert Ocariz (2

012635 TAB 32 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012636 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 20069 " JANE DOE NO. 1, by and through JANE DOE’s FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOR’s FATHER, and . . JANE DOE’s STEPMOTHER, individually, ciV-MA RRA Plaintiffs, MAGISTRATE JUDGH

U.S. Attorney HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012629 TAB 30 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012630 —_, cc bec (USAFLS)” 09/27/2007 03:06 PM Subject RE: Conference Call with Bert Ocariz Hi Jay — J already told Bert that there is no indictment and, as 1 mentioned, he doesn’t really need to/want to see the entire plea agreement, just