5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
ertain discovery that Plaintiffs were provided in the underlying Doe I. Epstein case. Specifically, the Joint Stipulation provides that Counsel for Jane Doe and Counsel for Epstein disagree whether certain correspondence, defined by the parties as "correspondence and documents (including content thereof
nt and Joint Stipulation (D.E. #211), the Court has jurisdiction to enforce the stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation. See American Disability Assn., Inc. ff. Chmielarz, 289 F.3d 1315, 1321 (11th Cir. 2002). The stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation and as approved
ertain discovery that Plaintiffs were provided in the underlying Doe I. Epstein case. Specifically, the Joint Stipulation provides that Counsel for Jane Doe and Counsel for Epstein disagree whether certain correspondence, defined by the parties as "correspondence and documents (including content thereof
nt and Joint Stipulation (D.E. #211), the Court has jurisdiction to enforce the stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation. See American Disability Assn., Inc. ff. Chmielarz, 289 F.3d 1315, 1321 (11th Cir. 2002). The stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation and as approved
ertain discovery that Plaintiffs were provided in the underlying Doe v. Epstein case. Specifically, the Joint Stipulation provides that Counsel for Jane Doe and Counsel for Epstein disagree whether certain correspondence, defined by the parties as "correspondence and documents (including content thereof
nt and Joint Stipulation (D.E. #211), the Court has jurisdiction to enforce the stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation. See American Disability Assn., Inc. V. Chmielarz, 289 F.3d 1315, 1321 (11th Cir. 2002). The stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation and as approved b
ertain discovery that Plaintiffs were provided in the underlying Doe v. Epstein case. Specifically, the Joint Stipulation provides that Counsel for Jane Doe and Counsel for Epstein disagree whether certain correspondence, defined by the parties as "correspondence and documents (including content thereof
nt and Joint Stipulation (D.E. #211), the Court has jurisdiction to enforce the stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation. See American Disability Assn., Inc. V. Chmielarz, 289 F.3d 1315, 1321 (11th Cir. 2002). The stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation and as approved b
ertain discovery that Plaintiffs were provided in the underlying Doe I. Epstein case. Specifically, the Joint Stipulation provides that Counsel for Jane Doe and Counsel for Epstein disagree whether certain correspondence, defined by the parties as "correspondence and documents (including content thereof
nt and Joint Stipulation (D.E. #211), the Court has jurisdiction to enforce the stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation. See American Disability Assn., Inc. ff. Chmielarz, 289 F.3d 1315, 1321 (11th Cir. 2002). The stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation and as approved
Entities connected to both Jane Doe and See American Disability Assn.

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATIONChambers
PERSONJANE DOE NO
PERSOND.E.
ORGANIZATIONthe State Court
ORGANIZATIONJustice Department Complaint
ORGANIZATIONLINNEA
ORGANIZATIONChmielarz
PERSONthe Internal Justice Department
ORGANIZATIONthe Florida Rules of Evidence
ORGANIZATIONthe Final Judgment
ORGANIZATIONR. JOHN
PERSONEpstein I. Rothstein
PERSONinternal Justice Department Proceeding
ORGANIZATION