Epstein Secrets

d by the government are subject to a protective order prohibiting their disclosure. In the related case 9:08-CV-80893 (the case where Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 sued Mr. Epstein for money), the Magistrate Judge prohibited Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2 EFTA00205542 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 160 Entered on

at are plainly the privileged opinion work-product of the attorneys, that constitute settlement negotiations under Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, and that contain information about matters occurring before the grand jury, which are strictly confidential under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedu

No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. / NOTICE OF OBJECTION Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 have moved for disclosure of settlement letters between the U.S. Attorney's Office and the lawyers who represented Jeffrey Epsicin du

etters fall under the protections of opinion work-product of the lawyers, as well as the broad protections of Federal Rules of Evidence 410 and 408, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, and the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel. The lawyers will also object to dissemination of these letters because they conta

08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. / NOTICE OF OBJECTION Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 have moved for disclosure of settlement letters between the U.S. Attorney's Office and the lawyers who represented Jeffrey Epsicin du

etters fall under the protections of opinion work-product of the lawyers, as well as the broad protections of Federal Rules of Evidence 410 and 408, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, and the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel. The lawyers will also object to dissemination of these letters because they conta