4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 I UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DO ' MOTION TO INTERVENE OF COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by
ontribute to the litigation. Department of Fair Employment and Housing I. Lucent Technologies, Inc., 2011 WL 1549232, at *6 (9th Cir. 2011) (citing Spangler. Pasadena City Bd. of Educ., 552 F.2d 1326(9th Cir.1977). Here, there is no indication that the Justice Department will do anything other than vigo
76 EFTA00601652 Appendix B Testimony Cases Last Four Years Year Retained Deliverables Retained by Case 2016 Deposition Report Plaintiff Jane Doe v. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc.; BHP Billiton Petroleum (Deepwater) Ltd.; Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Aramark Services, In
an Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST 2012), p.1- 10. 26-30 October. Baltimore, MD. Carman, S., Strong, R., Chandra, A.., Oh, S., Spangler, S., Anderson, and Jansen, B.J. (2012) Predictive Value of Comments in the Service Engagement Process. 75th Annual Meeting of the American Society
FLSD Docket 05)16.2011 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO INTERVENE OF BRUCE REINHART COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also r
ontribute to the litigation. Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., 2011 WL 1549232, at *6 (9th Cir. 2011) (citing Spangler v. Pasadena City Bd. of Educ., 552 F.2d 1326(9th Cir.1977). Here, there is no indication that the Justice Department will do anything other than v
N, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho
in the following corporations and entities: a. 29 Bahia LLC; b. 235 GC LW; c. 350 LOP#2840 LLC; d. 353 BR LLC; e. 10630 #110 LLC; f. 708 Spangler u.,o, g. 1012 Broward LLC; h. 1198 Dixie LLC; 1. 1299 Federal LLC; j. 2133 IP LLC; k. 15158 LLC; I. AANG LLC; 28 EFTA00729467 Case 0:
Entities connected to both Jane Doe and Spangler

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATIONMaria Farmer
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Prince Andrew
PERSONRoy Black
PERSONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON