Epstein Secrets

he defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, did knowingly and intentionally violate the privacy protection accoi y 18 U.S.C. § 3509 to a child victim, that is, Jane Doe #1; in violation of Title 18, United Sta de, Sections 403 and 2. COUNT 2 In or around 2005, in the special territorial jurisdiction of the United

the United States and the defendant. There are no other agents, promises, representations, or understandings. Date: By: R. AL ER ACOSTA UNITE TATES ATTORNEY Date: By: JEFFREY EPSTEIN?FENDANT Date: By: JAY LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT Page 7 of 7 EFTA00194015 by both th

lorida, and JEFFREY EPSTEIN, r did knowingly and intentionally violate the privacy protection acco y 18 U.S.C. § 3509 to a child victim, that is, Jane Doe #1; in violation of Title 18, United Sta de, Sections 403 and 2. COUNT 2 In or around 2005, in the special territorial jurisdiction of the United

I-. the defendant. There are no other Date: Date: Date: ents, promises, representations, or understandings. By: R. ALEFNDER ACOSTA UNITE TATES ATTORNEY By: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, DEFENDANT T By: JAY LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT Page 7 of 7 08-80736-CV-MARRA R FP WPB 000244 EF

fendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ib did knowingly and intentionally violate the privacy protection accol y 18 U.S.C. § 3509 to a child victim, that is, Jane Doe #1; in violation of Title 18, United Sta ode, Sections 403 and 2. COUNT 2 In or around 2005, in the special territorial jurisdiction of the Unit

nding between the United States and the defendant. There are no other agr nents, promises, representations, or understandings. Date: By: ER UNI TATES ATTORNEY Date: By: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, DEFENDANT T Date: By: JAY LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT Pago 7 of 7 08-80736-CV-MARRA

e defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, T did knowingly and intentionally violate the privacy protection acco y 18 U.S.C. § 3509 to a child victim, that is, Jane Doe #1; in violation of Title 18, United Stat Code, Sections 403 and 2. COUNT 7 In or around 2005, in the special territorial jurisdiction of the Unit

etween the United States and the defendant. There are no other a ents, promises, representations, or understandings. Date: By: R. ALL ER UNIT TATES ATTORNEY Date: By: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, DEFENDANT T Date: By: JAY LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT Page 7 of 7 08-80736-CV-MARRA