Epstein Secrets

rd Epstein between approximately 2006 and 2007. The statements we seek are those given to the FBI by our clients, each of whom has brought suit as a Jane Doe in the Southern District of Florida. The statements given to the FBI investigators are directly relevant because the FBI investigation concerned the

to a subpoena directed at a nonparty when the party claims a 'personal right or privilege' regarding the documents sought " Chaikin v. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Ins. Co. 2003 WL 22715826 (N.D. Ill. 2003) (emphasis supplied). Defendant Epstein does not claim any personal right or privilege regarding the documents

OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

to a subpoena directed at a nonparty when the party claims a 'personal right or privilege' regarding the documents sought." Chaikin v. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Ins. Co. 2003 WL 22715826 (N.D. Ill. 2003) (emphasis supplied). Defendant Epstein does not claim any personal right or privilege regarding the documents

OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

to a subpoena directed at a nonparty when the party claims a 'personal right or privilege' regarding the documents sought." Chaikin I. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Ins. Co. 2003 WL 22715826 (N.D. Ill. 2003) (emphasis supplied). Defendant Epstein does not claim any personal right or privilege regarding the documents

OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

to a subpoena directed at a nonparty when the party claims a 'personal right or privilege' regarding the documents sought." Chaikin I. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Ins. Co. 2003 WL 22715826 (N.D. Ill. 2003) (emphasis supplied). Defendant Epstein does not claim any personal right or privilege regarding the documents