Epstein Secrets

PLAINT IDE 24, 12/14/091 Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (EPSTEIN), by and through his attorneys, files his answer and affirmative defenses to Plaintiff JANE DOE No. 8's Amended Complaint, dated December 12, 2009 [DE 24], and states: 1. Without knowledge and deny. 2. As to the allegations in paragraphs 2, D

axiom against retroactive application of an amended statute, and also in violation of such constitutional principles, including but not limited to, the "Ex Post Facto" Clause, U.S. Const. Article I, §9, cl. 3, §10, cl. 1, and procedural and substantive due process, U.S. Const. 14th Amend., 5th Amend. The statute in effec

d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. - EFTA00221236 Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2009 Page 2 of 10 Jane Doe No. 7 v. Epstein Page 2 .. a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimi

axiom against retroactive application of an amended statute, and also in violation of such constitutional principles, including but not limited to, the "Ex Post Facto" Clause, U.S. Const. Article I, §9, cl. 3, §10, cl. 1, and procedural and substantive due process, U.S. Const. 14th Amend., 5th Amend. The statute in effec

. Defendants in civil actions. - EXHIBIT Pt EFTA00221246 Case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM Document 115-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2009 Page 2 of 10 Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 2 "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incri

axiom against retroactive application of an amended statute, and also in violation of such constitutional principles, including but not limited to, the "Ex Post Facto" Clause, U.S. Const. Article I, §9, cl. 3, §10, cl. 1, and procedural and substantive due process, U.S. Const. 14th Amend., 5th Amend. The statute in effec

d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. - EFTA00221260 Case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM Document 71 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2009 Page 2 of 10 Jane Doe No. 6 v. Epstein Page 2 "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incri

axiom against retroactive application of an amended statute, and also in violation of such constitutional principles, including but not limited to, the "Ex Post Facto" Clause, U.S. Const. Article I, §9, cl. 3, §10, cl. 1, and procedural and substantive due process, U.S. Const. 14th Amend., 5th Amend. The statute in effec

. Defendants in civil actions. - EXHIBIT A_ EFTA00221878 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 148-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2009 Page 2 of 10 Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Page 2 '... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incri

axiom against retroactive application of an amended statute, and also in violation of such constitutional principles, including but not limited to, the "Ex Post Facto" Clause, U.S. Const. Article I, §9, cl. 3, §10, ci. 1, and procedural and substantive due process, U.S. Const. 14th Amend., 5th Amend. The statute in effec

d on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 Page 5 of 11 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Background Defendant Epstein has filed a boilerplate motion to strike Jane Doe's trial date — and numerous other consolidated cases involving similar allegations of his sexual abuse of minors - for an unspecified period of time,

axiom against retroactive application of an amended statute, and also In violation of such constitutional principles, including but not limited to, the "Ex Post Facto" Clause, U.S. Const. Article I, §9, cl. 3, §10, cl. 1, and procedural and substantive due process, U.S. Const. 14th Amend., 5th Amend. The statute in effec