Epstein Secrets

PSTEIN, ROTHSTEIN, the Litigation Team and, at times, L.M., E.W., Jane Doe in the Civil Actions against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Made Jane Doe available for TV media intervie

half of certain clients, filed a 147 page Complaint against ROTHSTEIN, BODEN, VILLEGAS, BARNETT, TD Bank, N.A., Frank Spinosa, Jennifer Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsky and Frank Preve asserting various allegations that further prove the massive Ponzi scheme behind the RRA façade; and EFTA00725335 Epstein v. RRA,

ion Team and, at times, L.M. in the Civil Action against EPSTEIN: EFTA00725306 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 19 a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Made Jane Doe available for TV media intervie

half of certain clients, filed a 147 page Complaint against ROTHSTEIN, BODEN, VILLEGAS, BARNETT, TD Bank, N.A., Frank Spinosa, Jennifer Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsky and Frank Preve asserting various allegations that further prove the massive Ponzi scheme behind the RRA façade; and as of November 25, 2009, a 249

riod and say, You 25 know, I should have realized there was something that were being prosecuted on behalf of throe young 1 woman: M., B.N. and Jane Doe. And w➢ will refer to them when I talk to you about them in that ➢ame way, 4 referring to sham by those initial➢ and that 5 pseudonym. 4 Desc

sue -- who does he sue? 13 A Scott Rothstein, David Roden, Debra 'Allegan, 14 Andrew Barnett, TO Bank, Frank Spinoaa, Jennifer IS Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsky and Frank Prove. 14 Q And Mr. Rothstein was the chairman of the 17 Rothstein firm? IS A On November 20, 2009, I don't believe he was, 19 bu

OTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

STEIN, David Boden, Debra Villegas, Andrew Barnett, TD Bank, N.A., Frank EFTA00190033 Epstein I RRA, et al. Page 9 Spinosa, Jennifer Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsky and Frank Preve asserting various allegations that further prove the massive Ponzi scheme behind the RRA facade; and as of November 25, 2009, a 249

OTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

TEIN, David Boden, Debra Villegas, Andrew Barnett, TD Bank, N.A., Frank EFTA00596496 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 9 Spinosa, Jennifer Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsky and Frank Preve asserting various allegations that further prove the massive Ponzi scheme behind the RRA facade; and as of November 25, 2009, a 249

N, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

TEIN, David Boden, Debra Villegas, Andrew Barnett, TD Bank, N.A., Frank EFTA00729411 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 9 Spinosa, Jennifer Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsky and Frank Preve asserting various allegations that further prove the massive Ponzi scheme behind the RRA facade; and as of November 25, 2009, a 249

, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) ded claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in rces s of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

TEIN, David Boden, Debra Villegas, Andrew Barnett, TD Bank, N.A., Frank EFTA00795595 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 9 Spinosa, Jennifer Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsky and Frank Preve asserting various allegations that further prove the massive Ponzi scheme behind the RRA facade; and as of November 25, 2009, a 249

A, ROTHSTEIN and EDWARDS claiming the need for anonymity with regard to existing or fabricated clients, they were able to effectively use initials, Jane Doe or other anonymous designations which was a key element in the fraudulent scheme. Fictitious names could be created to make the investors believe m

ROTHSTEIN, David Boden, Debra Villegas, Andrew Barnett, TD Bank, N.A., Frank EFTA00286290 Epsteh v. RRA, et al. Page 9 Spinosa, IMMI Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsky and Frank Preve asserting various allegations that further prove the massive Ponzi scheme behind the RRA facade; and as of November 25, 2009, a 249

THSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for dirnages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

nst ROTHSTEIN, David Boden, Debra Villegas, Andrew Bamett, TD Bank, N.A., Frank EFTA00193822 Epstein I RRA, et al. Page 9 Spinosa, Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsky and Frank Preve asserting various allegations that further prove the massive Ponzi scheme behind the RRA facade; and as of November 25, 2009, a 249

ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for de-triages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

nst ROTHSTEIN, David Baden, Debra Villegas, Andrew Barnett, TD Bank, N.A., Frank EFTA00223275 Epstein RRA, et al, Page 9 Spinosa, Kerstetter, Rosanne Caretsky and Frank Preve asserting various allegations that further prove the massive Ponzi scheme behind the RRA facade; and as of November 25, 2009, a 249