Epstein Secrets

tline Response in Opposition 04/03/18 PVD [No Charge] Work on hearing binder re Farmer l e 's Motion to Show Cause, Edwards' Joinder, , E.W. and Jane Doe's Joinder and Motion to ervene 04/03/18 PVD [No Charge] Work on exhibit of comparison of privilege log for in camera inspection; work on Exhibit A

Camera Review; work on Exhibit A to same which compares 47 e-mails (proposed trial exhibit privilege log entries; work on Response to ., E.W. and Jane Doe's Joinder in bankruptcy Motion to Show Cause; work on Response to Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause; work on proposed Order Sealing disc and exh

ling Order, work on preparations for April 4, 2018, UMC hearing on B. Edwards' Motion to Change Case Style and Case Management; review B. Edwards' Motion for Sanctions; work on Response to Motion to Show Cause in Bankruptcy; follow up with bankruptcy counsel and D. Indyke re same; review Motions to Strike filed i

/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake Cit UT 84112-0730 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for M , E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for n, E.W. and Jane Doe 14

ief. If merely referencing the documents' existence is a violation of the Court's ruling, then Edwards, himself, violated it with the filing of his Motion for Sanctions citing the alleged statements and by filing his Motion for Order to Show Cause in the Bankruptcy Court. Not once has Epstein or his counsel violate

ff/Comter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for M, E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for M, E.W. and Jane Doe 14

ief. If merely referencing the documents' existence is a violation of the Court's ruling, then Edwards, himself, violated it with the filing of his Motion for Sanctions citing the alleged statements and by filing his Motion for Order to Show Cause in the Bankruptcy Court. In fact, the challenged statements are appr

0994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 / OMNIBUS ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff Jane Doe 3's Motion for Sanctions and Motion for Protective Order (D.E. #444); and Defendant Epstein's related Motion for Sanctions (D.E. #450). Having rev

. #444) is DENIED; and 2 EFTA00728572 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 554 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2010 Page 3 of 3 (2) Defendant Epstein's Motion for Sanctions (D.E. #450) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this June 1, 2010, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R.J9Dt SON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE J

; Doe II - Clerk's Notice of Reassignment 04/13/2009 RDC Receipt and review Doe ll's offer of settlement 04/13/2009 MJP Review and analysis of Jane Doe's Response in Opposition to Motion to Slay 04/14/2009 RDC E-mails; review motions/responses re: Pacer on #2-7; Response to Stay 04/14/2009 RDC Co

450.00 04/02/2009 RDC Continued work re: cases and what is outstanding and responses needed 1.10 hr $550.00 04/02/2009 RDC Letter re: Sid #2; Motion for Sanctions re: discovery 0.70 hr $350.00 04/02/2009 RDC Letter to Sid re: new Federal and directions; to do 0.40 hr $200.00 04/02/2009 RDC Telephone c