Epstein Secrets

OTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

and L.M. are liable for damages caused to EPSTEIN — individually, and jointly and severally. Count I — Violation of 4§772.101, et seq., Fla. Stat - Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act — Against All Defendants 54. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 53 as if fully set forth herein. EFTA00190055 Epstein R

PSTEIN, ROTHSTEIN, the Litigation Team and, at times, L.M., E.W., Jane Doe in the Civil Actions against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Made Jane Doe available for TV media intervie

on Team are liable for damages caused to EPSTEIN — individually, and jointly and severally. Count I — Violation of §§772.101, et seq., Fla. Stat. - Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act — Against All Defendants 62. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through as if fully set forth herein. 63. RRA, ROTHSTEIN, BODEN, V

ion Team and, at times, L.M. in the Civil Action against EPSTEIN: EFTA00725306 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 19 a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Made Jane Doe available for TV media intervie

on Team are liable for damages caused to EPSTEIN — individually, and jointly and severally. Count I — Violation of §§772.101, et seq., Fla. Stat. - Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act — Against All Defendants 62. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through as if fully set forth herein. 63. RRA, ROTHSTEIN, FISTEN,

A, ROTHSTEIN and EDWARDS claiming the need for anonymity with regard to existing or fabricated clients, they were able to effectively use initials, Jane Doe or other anonymous designations which was a key element in the fraudulent scheme. Fictitious names could be created to make the investors believe m

RDS and are liable for damages caused to EPSTEIN — individually, and jointly and severally. Count I — Violation of 64772.101, et seq., Fla. Stat. - Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act — Against All Defendants 54. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 53 as if fully set forth herein. EFTA00286312 Epstein v.

OTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

and L.M. are liable for damages caused to EPSTEIN — individually, and jointly and severally. Count I - Violation of 44772.101, et seq., Fla. Stat. - Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act — Against All Defendants 54. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 53 as if fully set forth herein. EFTA00596518 Epstein v.

THSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for dirnages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

and L.M. are liable for damages caused to EPSTEIN — individually, and jointly and severally. Count I Violation of §4772.101, et seq., Fla. Stat. - Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act — Against All Defendants 54. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 53 as if fully set forth herein. EFTA00193794 Epstein 1 R

ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for de-triages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

and M. are liable for damages caused to EPSTEIN — individually, and jointly and severally. Count I — Violation of 44772.101, et seq., Fla. Stat. - Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act — Against All Defendants 54. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 53 as if fully set forth herein. EFTA00223297 Epstein!. R

N, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

S and ■. are liable for damages caused to EPSTEIN — individually, and jointly and severally. Count I — Violation of O772.101, et seq., Fla. Stat. - Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act — Against All Defendants 54. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 53 as if fully set forth herein. EFTA00729433 Epstein v.

, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) ded claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in rces s of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

— individually, and jointly and severally. fraudulent and criminal that EPSTEIN has been Count I — Violation of §§772.101, et seg.,,Fla. Stat. - Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act — Against All Defendants 54. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 53 as if fully set forth herein. EFTA00795617 Epstein v.