Epstein Secrets

. ." DE 189 at 1. The Court went on to rule for the victims on the rescission issue, explaining that "in their petition and supplemental pleadings, Jane Doe 1 and 2 have identified a remedy which is likely to redress the injury complained of — the setting aside of the non-prosecution agreement as a prelude

s in it. 8 EFTA00613651 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 311 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2015 Page 9 of 21 defendants or new claims. See King v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 2010 WL 5253526, at *10 (S.D. Fla. 2010). Courts have frequently allowed plaintiffs to amend their pleading to add new plaintiffs. See, e.g., Jos

. ." DE 189 at 1. The Court went on to rule for the victims on the rescission issue, explaining that "in their petition and supplemental pleadings, Jane Doe 1 and 2 have identified a remedy which is likely to redress the injury complained of — the setting aside of the non-prosecution agreement as a prelude

rds in it. 8 EFTA00210702 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 311 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2015 Page 9 of 21 defendants or new claims. See King, Cessna Aircraft Co., 2010 WL 5253526, at *10 (S.D. Fla. 2010). Courts have frequently allowed plaintiffs to amend their pleading to add new plaintiffs. See, e.g., Jos

.." DE 189 at I. The Court went on to rule for the victims on the rescission issue, explaining that "in their petition and supplemental pleadings, Jane Doe 1 and 2 have identified a remedy which is likely to redress the injury complained of — the setting aside of the non-prosecution agreement as a prelude

s in it. 8 EFTA01626122 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 311 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2015 Page 9 of 21 defendants or new claims. See King v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 2010 WL 5253526, at *10 (S.D. Ha. 2010). Courts have frequently allowed plaintiffs to amend their pleading to add new plaintiffs. See, e.g., Josh

affirm the judgment of the District Court. John DOE # 1; Kelly Doe # 1, Parents of Jane Doe # 1, Individually and as Guardians on behalf of Minor Jane Doe # 1; John Doe # 2; Kelly Doe # 2, Parents of Jane Doe # 2, as Guardians on behalf of Minor Jane Doe # 2 I William Lawson CHAMBERLIN, Jr.; Kathr

Texas courts apply the "most significant relationship" test set out in Restatement Restatement (Secon Conflict of Laws §§ 6 and 145. See Duncan Cessna Aircraft Co., 665 S.W.2d 414, 420-21 ex.I984) ("[f]n all choice of law cases, except those contract cases in which the parties have agreed to a valid choice o