Epstein Secrets

Martin G. Weinberg < > wrote: I have no advanced knowledge as to this afternoon's agenda but would expect they would want some history on the NPA, Jane Doe #102 lawsuit, the investigation, the CVRA, A letter from them to USAO has no downsides. A filing from them on Alan's behalf in the CVRA is also some

downsides. A filing from them on Alan's behalf in the CVRA is also something they are considering. It may or more likely may not get traction with J Marra (see his attached order on Reinhart) but it would at least put before your judge Alan's strong denials and, as important, a distancing of Alan from

Martin G. Weinberg < > wrote: I have no advanced knowledge as to this afternoon's agenda but would expect they would want some history on the NPA, Jane Doe #102 lawsuit, the investigation, the CVRA, A letter from them to USAO has no downsides. A filing from them on Alan's behalf in the CVRA is also some

downsides. A filing from them on Alan's behalf in the CVRA is also something they are considering. It may or more likely may not get traction with J Marra (see his attached order on Reinhart) but it would at least put before your judge Alan's strong denials and, as important, a distancing of Alan from

9 - Denial of Intervention.pdf I have no advanced knowledge as to this afternoon's agenda but would expect they would want some history on the NPA, Jane Doe #102 lawsuit, the investigation, the CVRA, A letter from them to USAO has no downsides. A filing from them on Alan's behalf in the CVRA is also some

o downsides. A filing from them on Alan's behalf in the CVRA is also something they are considering. It may or more likely may not get traction with J Marra (see his attached order on Reinhart) but it would at least put before your judge Alan's strong denials and, as important, a distancing of Alan from