Epstein Secrets

") between them as follows: 1. Case No. 09-CV-80656— Marra/Johnson. The Parties agree to immediately dismiss the pending lawsuit presently styled Jane Doe No. 102 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 09-CV-80656 — Marra/Johnson (Southern District of Florida), with prejudice upon payment and clearance of the

other than a specific family member(s) (whose identity must be disclosed to Second Parties' counsel as "Attorneys Eyes Only" and provided to Burman, Caton, Luther & Coleman in a sealed envelope to be opened only if a third party has alleged to have breached this provision) unless otherwise required by

ad been reached with Epstein. Mr. Edwards first learned of this fact on or after July 9, 2008, when the Government filed its responsive pleading to Jane Doe's emergency petition. That pleading was the first public mention of the non-prosecution agreement and the first disclosure to Mr. Edwards and his cli

onape flees of Bus awn In Thir Sate 7 4 74 Careen •T Another Sitio 7 7 2 Ineorpomied mud Norval Parer of Dome.. Is Aitc•ihst Scam 1 3 7 Caton or Stases oft 3 3 3 3 loremn Nalien 3 D 3 6 Fene Comity IRE OF SUIT • 'is U44Bo. - - - - - E CONTRACT TORTS FORECITUREIPENAL TY

A. Marra on 7/16/08. (ir) (Entered: 07/16/2008) 07/18/2008 25 RESPONSE to Motion re 12 Defendant's MOTION to Stay and Memorandum of Law filed by Jane Doe. Replies due by 7/28/2008. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/18/2008) 07/21/2008 26 AFFIDAVIT signed by : Jeffrey M. Her

10/06/2008 41 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 37 Amended Complaint and for More Definite Statement by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 10/24/2008 (Caton, Robert) (Entered: 10/06/2008) 10/06/2008 42 MOTION for More Definite Statement directed to amended complaint by Jeffrey Epstein. See image DE 41