Epstein Secrets

S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 (above for address purposes only) Attorney E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe EFTA00808146

v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit") to the RRA trustee, were 1 EFTA00808140 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6382 Filed 05/14/18 Page 2 of 7 to be print

standing to argue against Epstein's Motion for Protective Order. The response to Epstein's Motion for Protective Order came not from the Plaintiff, Jane Doe or on behalf of the Plaintiff Jane Doe, but by her counsel, claiming he in fact was the real party in interest. Edwards, in his response, shows no b

mmary Judgment without requesting them first and giving Epstein the opportunity to object and a Court to rule. Epstein v. Edwards, 502009CA40800XXXX MB AG, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida. If the documents are used outside the context of a court proceeding, to advance a legislat

PA told Law360, "Mr. Epstein never even knew Fowler White had the disc until we found it." Counsel for three victims — identified as L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe — asked Judge Hafele to order Fowler White to explain its handling of the confidential documents, but he said he lacked the authority to do so sinc

he U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al., case number 50-2009CA04800)COCX MB AG, in the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida. —Additional reporting by Carolina Bolado. Editing by Jill Coffey. View commen

S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 (above for address purposes only) Attorney E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe EFTA00795944

n v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit"). The result of that subpoena was the production from the RRA trustee of approximately 27,000 emails to be deliv

f then-minor girls in his Palm Beach mansion in the Southern District of Florida and elsewhere. Several of these victims, including L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe," were represented by Farmer Jaffe attorney Bradley J. Edwards in their civil suits against Epstein. [DE 1120]. 2. Edwards filed the three sexual

n v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit"). 4. On April 17, 2010, Epstein served a subpoena in the Epstein lawsuit upon Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA ("

standing to argue against Epstein's Motion for Protective Order. The response to Epstein's Motion for Protective Order came not from the Plaintiff, Jane Doe or on behalf of the Plaintiff Jane Doe, but by her counsel, claiming he in fact was the real party in interest. Edwards, in his response, shows no b

thout requesting them first and giving Epstein the opportunity to object and a Court to rule. See [D.E. 118], Epstein v. Edwards, 502009CA40800XXXX MB AG, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida. At this point there is no reason for Mr. Epstein to become involved in the case where Edwar