Epstein Secrets

ther authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number of prosecutors involved in the dec

to some or all of the conditions proposed supra, or any other conditions the Court deems necessary and appropriate. Yours truly, Reid Weingarten Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro hac vice forthcoming) Martin G. Wein

R August 7, 2017 VIA EMAIL Michael Miller, Esq. Steptoe & Johnson, LLP 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York NY 10036 [email protected] Re: Jane Doe 43 v. Jeffrey Epstein, et al. Case No.: 17-cv-616 Dear Mr. Miller, We are in receipt of you Rule 11 notice wherein you state that Jane Doe 43 does

BSF Si rid McCawle Tele hone: Email: BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER August 7, 2017 VIA EMAIL Michael Miller, Esq. Steptoe & Johnson, LLP 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York NY 10036 [email protected] Re: Jane Doe 43 v. Jeffrey Epstein, et al. Case No.: 17-cv-616 Dear Mr.

IES SCHILLER FLEXNER August 7, 2017 VIA EMAIL Michael Miller, Esq. Steptoe & Johnson, LLP 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York NY 10036 Re: Jane Doe 43 v. Jeffrey Epstein, et al. Case No.: 17-cv-616 Dear Mr. Miller, We are in receipt of you Rule 11 notice wherein you state that Jane Doe 43 does

BSF Si 'cl McCawle Tele hone: Email: BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER August 7, 2017 VIA EMAIL Michael Miller, Esq. Steptoe & Johnson, LLP 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York NY 10036 Re: Jane Doe 43 v. Jeffrey Epstein, et al. Case No.: 17-cv-616 Dear Mr. Miller, We are in r

have alleged and now proven that the previous non-prosecution agreement was structured in violation of the rights of many of the victims. was the Jane Doe in that lawsuit. And for that reason, she has a particular interest in this case. We want to first say we appreciate your Honor's acknowledgment S

y for the Southern District of New York 16 BY: 17 Assistant United States Attorneys 18 Martin G. Weinberg, PC 19 Attorney for Defendant 20 Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Attorneys for Defendant 21 BY: REID WEINGARTEN 22 MARC FERNICH Attorney for Defendant 23 JAMES BROCHIN 24 Attorney for Defendant

For internal use only SDNY_GM_00059611 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(F IDENTIAL DB-SONY-0022435 EFTA_00170161 EFTA01296829 Page 105 Jane Doe 43 V. Epstein Et Al 1:17cv616 •" THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright @ 2017 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR

nue New York, NY, USA 10016 (212) 210-9400 Fax: (212) 210-9444 Email:[email protected] Michael Campion Miller [ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED] Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue Of The Americas New York, NY, USA 10036 (212) 506-3900 Fax: (212) 506-3950 Email:[email protected] Justin Y.K. Chu [ATTO

ther authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number of prosecutors involved in the dec

to some or all of the conditions proposed supra, or any other conditions the Court deems necessary and appropriate. Yours truly, Reid Weingarten Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 (202)-506-3900 Fax: (212)-506-3950 [email protected] Martin G. Weinberg (applic

ther authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number of prosecutors involved in the dec

to some or all of the conditions proposed supra, or any other conditions the Court deems necessary and appropriate. Yours truly, Reid Weingarten Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro hac vice forthcoming) Martin G. Wein

e suit. 5 Gut. thLink & Rockenbach, P.A. Lesley Groff 19 $5,509,464 Jeffrey Epstein Link & Rockenbach represented Groff and Epstein in the Jane Doe 43 lawsuit. It is possible that these payments were made solely for the benefit of Epstein. The transaction dates coincide with the lawsuit. " Se

le y Groff I $100.000 Jeffrey Epstein See Link and Rockenbach entry, supra. Steptoe & Johnson LLP Lesley Groff 8 $490,001 Jeffrey Epstein Steptoe & Johnson represented both Groff and Epstein in connection with the Jane Doe 43 lawsuit. As before, it is possible that these payments were made solely for