Epstein Secrets

led a motion in it seeking to block the use of certain incriminating correspondence in a separate state proceeding that he himself initiated against Jane Doe's attorney, Bradley J. Edwards. Epstein's motion should be denied because there is no basis for a federal court to enter a new order blocking disclos

V-80893-MARRAJJOHNSON BACKGROUND A. Epstein's Lawsuit Against Edwards. On December 7, 2009, in an apparent (but unsuccessful) effort to intimidate Jane Doe's attorney Bradley J. Edwards, defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed a lawsuit in the 15°' Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida against Edwards alle

g this case. The basis for the closure was -the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein." Doc. 38, Case No. 9:08-CV-80736, Order Closing Case at 1. Jane Doe #1 and #2 are in the process of preparing a pleading advising the Court of this fact and asking for the case to remain open. 6 EFTA

led a motion in it seeking to block the use of certain incriminating correspondence in a separate state proceeding that he himself initiated against Jane Doe's attorney, Bradley J. Edwards. Bradley Edwards filed a response, and the Magistrate Judge denied Epstein's motion. The Magistrate Judge ruled that h

FLSD Docket 10/07/2010 Page 2 of 9 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARFtAiJOHNSON On December 7, 2009, in an apparent (but unsuccessful) effort to intimidate Jane Doe's attorney Bradley J. Edwards, defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed a lawsuit in the 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida against Edwards alleg

g this case. The basis for the closure was "the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein." Doc. 38, Case No. 9:08-CV-80736, Order Closing Case at 1. Jane Doe #1 and #2 are in the process of preparing a pleading advising the Court of this fact and asking for the case to remain open. 6 EFTA

led a motion in it seeking to block the use of certain incriminating correspondence in a separate state proceeding that he himself initiated against Jane Doe's attorney, Bradley J. Edwards. Epstein's motion should be denied because there is no basis for a federal court to enter a new order blocking disclos

V-80893-MARRAJJOHNSON BACKGROUND A. Epstein's Lawsuit Against Edwards. On December 7, 2009, in an apparent (but unsuccessful) effort to intimidate Jane Doe's attorney Bradley J. Edwards, defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed a lawsuit in the 15°' Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida against Edwards alle

g this case. The basis for the closure was -the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein." Doc. 38, Case No. 9:08-CV-80736, Order Closing Case at 1. Jane Doe #1 and #2 are in the process of preparing a pleading advising the Court of this fact and asking for the case to remain open. 6 EFTA

rder of Dismissal Rosenfeld( vs. Rothstein Doe 1 Case #6596 Doe II Case # 20614 Document Production Doe II Case # 20614 Jane Doe 8 Case # 80802 Jane Doe 102 Case # 80656 CMA Case# 80811 AC Case # 25129 DRAWER TWO: Josefsberg Invoices and Disc 81092 Doe 2 Case # 80119 Doe 3 Case# 80232 EFTA0029

(Signed Settlement, Stipulation of Dismissal, Final Order of Dismissal) (Signed Settlement) (Stipulation of Dismissal, Order Dismissing Claims and Closing Case) (Signed Settlement) (Signed Settlement, Stipultion of Dismissal, Final Order of Dismissal, Order Adopting & Entering Joint Stipulation) (Signed

der of Dismissal Rosenfeldt vs. Rothstein Doe 1 Case # 6596 Doe II Case # 20614 Document Production Doe II Case # 20614 Jane Doe 8 Case # 80802 Jane Doe 102 Case ft 80656 CMA Casett 80811 AC Case tt 25129 DRAWER TWO: Josefsberg Invoices and Disc 81092 Doe 2 Case it 80119 Doe 3 Case# 80232 DRAW

(Signed Settlement, Stipulation of Dismissal, Final Order of Dismissal) (Signed Settlement) (Stipulation of Dismissal, Order Dismissing Claims and Closing Case) (Signed Settlement) (Signed Settlement, Stipultion of Dismissal, Final Order of Dismissal, Order Adopting & Entering Joint Stipulation) (Signed

der of Dismissal Rosenfeldt vs. Rothstein Doe 1 Case # 6596 Doe II Case # 20614 Document Production Doe II Case # 20614 Jane Doe 8 Case # 80802 Jane Doe 102 Case # 80656 CMA Case# 80811 AC Case # 25129 DRAWER TWO: Josefsberg Invoices and Disc 81092 Doe 2 Case # 80119 Poe 3 Case# 80232 DRAWER T

(Signed Settlement, Stipulation of Dismissal, Final Order of Dismissal) (Signed Settlement) (Stipulation of Dismissal, Order Dismissing Claims and Closing Case) (Signed Settlement) (Signed Settlement, Stipultion of Dismissal, Final Order of Dismissal, Order Adopting & Entering Joint Stipulation) (Signed